| Title | Eval_1 | Eval_2 | Category | Rating_1 | Confidence_range_1 | Comments_1 | Rating_2 | Confidence_range_2 | Comments_2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Comparative Impact of Cash Transfers and a Psychotherapy Program on Psychological and Economic Well-being | anonymous | anonymous | Overall assessment | 90 | 3 | 75 | (65, 85) | |||
| Advancing knowledge and practice | 90 | 2 | 70 | (60, 90) | It provides useful evidence on the (in)effectiveness of CBT for general populations and was well-designed to investigate other important questions. | |||||
| Methods: Justification, reasonableness, validity, robustness | 90 | 3 | 90 | (85, 95) | A well-executed RCT with effort to avoid bias. | |||||
| Logic & communication | 80 | 4 | 75 | (70, 90) | Generally good, some claims could be better supported. | |||||
| Open, collaborative, replicable | 70 | 5 | 50 | (40, 80) | Data and code arenÕt available but I think this is standard for unpublished papers so I downweight this category. ThereÕs some small discrepancies between the numbers reported in section III.B and the actual numbers in Table 1. Pre-analysis plan is av |
| Title,Eval_1,Eval_2,Category,Rating_1,Confidence_range_1,Comments_1,Rating_2,Confidence_range_2,Comments_2 | |
| Mental Health Therapy As a Core Strategy For Increasing Human Capital: Evidence From Ghana,Anonymous,Anonymous,Overall assessment,75,4,,75,"(70, 84)", | |
| ,,,Advancing knowledge and practice,65,4,,60,"(55, 65)", | |
| ,,,"Methods: Justification, reasonableness, validity, robustness",60,3,,90,"(82, 94)", | |
| ,,,Logic & communication,75,3,,70,"(62, 82)","I wish these categories were separated - would rank it high for logic but lower for communication. Even though this is an extremely well written (clear and easy to follow) paper, I struggled with some of the framing and messaging (i.e. higher-level communication)." | |
| ,,,"Open, collaborative, replicable",50,3,,90,"(80, 95)","Data and code are provided alongside the published paper (https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/164481/version/V1/view) I have not tried to reproduce any of the analyses as I do not have access to Stata, hence wider CIs. Readme file is detailed a |
| Category_abbrev,Rating_1,Confidence_range_1,Rating_2,Confidence_range_2,Rating_3,Confidence_range_3,Comments_1,Comments_2,Comments_3,Category_described,Title,Eval_1,Eval_2,Eval_3 | |
| Overall,80,"(70, 90)",80,4,79,"(59,94)","Excellent as an overview, and important for global health, but unfortunately somewhat disappointing about ways to address global catastrophic risks. [EditorÕs note: the evaluator has explained that they have not based their assessment on this point; we do not intend Ê'Relevance to Global Priorities"" to factor into the overall assessment)",,,Overall assessment,Advance Market Commitments: Insights from Theory and Experience,David Manheim,Dan Tortorice,Joel Tan | |
| Adv. Knowl.,25,"(20,40)",90,5,90,"(70, 100)","This was a review, not intended to directly advance knowledge. To the extent that it claims additional usefulness of AMCs, it seems not to have addressed other options.",,,Advancing knowledge and practice,Advance Market Commitments: Insights from Theory and Experience,David Manheim,Dan Tortori |
| Category_abbrev,Rating_1,Confidence_range_1,Rating_2,Confidence_range_2,Comments_1,Comments_2,Category_described,Title,Eval_1,Eval_2 | |
| Overall,80,"(70, 90)",50,4,,,Overall assessment,Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth,Seth Benzell,Philip Trammell | |
| Adv. Knowl.,75,"(65, 85)",90,5,,,Advancing knowledge and practice,Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth,Seth Benzell,Philip Trammell | |
| Methods,80,"(75, 85)",80,4,,"Somewhat scattered, and in that sense less robust","Methods: Justification, reasonableness, validity, robustness",Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth,Seth Benzell,Philip Trammell | |
| Logic & Comm.,70,"(60, 80)",80,4,,"An awkward combination of intensive focus on some things and selective breadth in others. Also, unusually many typos and minor errors. On the other hand, logical and very clearly written.",Logic & communication,Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth,Seth Benzell,Philip Trammell | |
| Collab.,95,"(90, 100)",90,3,,,"Open, collaborative, replicable",Artificial Intelligence and Econ |
| paper name here | John Smith | Anonymous | Jane Doe | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Rating (0-100) | 90% CI (0-100) | Comments (footnote) | Rating (0-100) | Confidence: * High = 5, Low = 0 | Comments | Rating (0-100) | 90% CI (0-100) | Comments | |
| Overall assessment | 50 | (40, 65) | 50 | 4 | 79 | 59-94 | ||||
| Advancing knowledge and practice | 25 | (20,40) | 90 | 5 | 90 | 70-100 | ||||
| Methods: Justification, reasonableness, validity, robustness | 95 | (85,97.5) | 80 | 4 | 70 | 50-90 | ||||
| Logic & communication | 75 | (60,90) | 80 | 4 | 70 | 50-90 | ||||
| Open, collaborative, replicable | N/A | N/A | 90 | 3 | 50 | 30-70 | ||||
| Engaging with real-world, impact quantification; practice, realism, and relevance | 90 | 70-100 |
| ```{r} | |
| library(readr) | |
| gifts_2022_12_15_2017 <- read_csv("~/Downloads/gifts_2022-12-15_2017.csv") | |
| Downloaded from link in https://yieldgiving.com/gifts/?sorting=az | |
| ``` | |
| ```{r} | |
| # Load the stringr package | |
| library(stringr) |
#rstats I think I'll switch to Quarto. It seems it can do all Bookdown can do & more, with better support.
— 𝙳𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚍 𝚁𝚎𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚒𝚗 (@GivingTools) March 30, 2022
- Anyone know tools/templates for converting projects from Rmd/Bookdown to Quarto?
- Am I losing something from making the switch?
@xieyihui
At Rethink we set up this template and tools.
For much of my work I was using the Bookdown style and template I worked on here
But I think I am (and we are) moving to Quarto. ... Quarto pages and Quart
I need to maintain 2 versions of a page, site, or report, for different audiences. E.g., one ‘public’ and one ‘private within group’
I keep each of these on distinct branches in the same repository
Alternatively I could make these separate repositories, one fork in the other, although that feels more bulky