You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Discussion and annotation of Osborne and Rubinstein "Models in Microeconomic Theory"
(Discussion between David Reinstein and Britt Li, possibly others)
Chapter 1
1.1 Preferences
A binary relation on a set $X$ specifies, for each ordered pair $(x , y )$ of members of X , whether or not x relates to y in a certain way. For example, “acquaintance” is a binary relation on a set of people. For some pairs (x , y ) of people, the state- ment “x is acquainted with y ” is true, and for some pairs it is false. Another example of a binary relation is “smaller than” on the set of numbers. For some pairs (x,y ) of numbers, x is smaller than y , and for some it is not. For a binary relation R, the expression x R y means that x is related to y according to R. For any pair (x , y ) of members of X , the statement x R y either holds or does not hold. For example, for the binary relation < on the set of numbers, we have 3 < 5, but not7<1.
Britt questions:
Not sure the meaning of ‘binary relation’. Does it refer to relationships between two objects?
What does ‘acquaintance’ example mean?
Given that R stands for relation, what does xRy means? Does it mean the relationship between x and y? If so, what does yRx mean?
I am still confused with the concept of ‘reflexivity’ after reading these paragraphs. Does it mean all ‘x’ are the same?
\
1.2 Preference formation
Britt questions:
Not sure what this unanimity rule means
1.3 An experiment
Britt questions:
Everything makes sense to me
1.4 Utility functions
Britt questions:
I don’t understand the entire sections, since I can’t understand the minimal and maximal alternatives and since the following parts do not make sense to me.