Jaid

ESLint rules

The ESM standard is considered stable in NodeJS and well supported by a lot of modern JavaScript tools.

ESLint does a good job validating and fixing ESM code (as long as you don't use top-level await, coming in ESLint v8). Make sure to enable the latest ECMA features in the ESLint config.

• .eslint.json

{

FunDeckHermit

version: "3"

services:
  server:
    image: gitea/gitea:latest
    environment:
      - USER_UID=1000
      - USER_GID=1000
    restart: always
    volumes:

LukeChannings

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?><manifest xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" android:compileSdkVersion="29" android:compileSdkVersionCodename="10" android:installLocation="auto" package="com.plexapp.android" platformBuildVersionCode="29" platformBuildVersionName="10">
    <uses-permission android:name="com.android.vending.BILLING"/>
    <uses-feature android:name="android.hardware.touchscreen" android:required="false"/>
    <uses-feature android:name="android.hardware.screen.landscape" android:required="false"/>
    <uses-feature android:name="android.hardware.location" android:required="false"/>
    <uses-feature android:name="android.hardware.location.gps" android:required="false"/>
    <uses-feature android:name="android.hardware.location.network" android:required="false"/>
    <uses-feature android:name="android.hardware.telephony" android:required="false"/>
    <uses-feature android:name="android.hardware.microphone" android:required="false"/>
    <uses-featu

AlexanderWillner

#!/bin/bash

# Description: Downloads Web Albums shared by Apple Photos
# Requirements: jq
# Usage: ./icloud-album-download.sh <URL> [<target folder>]
# Source: https://gist.github.com/AlexanderWillner/b8124af1979e88d4046987c953b8260f
# Author: @zneak, @WildDIC, @AlexanderWillner

if [[ -z "$1" ]]; then
  echo "Syntax: $0 <URL> [<target folder>]" >&2

DasWolke

Microservice Bots

What they are and why you should use them

Introduction

Recently more and more chatbots appear, the overall chatbot market grows and the platform for it grows as well. Today we are taking a close look at what benefits creating a microservice chatbot on Discord - (a communication platform mainly targeted at gamers) would provide.

The concepts and ideas explained in this whitepaper are geared towards bots with a bigger userbase where the limits of a usual bot style appear with a greater effect

Information about Discord itself

(If you are already proficient with the Discord API and the way a normal bot works, you may skip ahead to The Concept)

Lakshanz

#!/bin/bash  
# Full path to tc binary 

TC=$(which tc)

#
# NETWORK CONFIGURATION
# interface - name of your interface device
# interface_speed - speed in mbit of your $interface
# ip - IP address of your server, change this if you don't want to use

montanaflynn

var express = require('express')

var app = express()

app.listen(1337)

app.all('/stream/:chunks', function (req, res, next) {

  res.writeHead(200, {
    'Content-Type': 'text/plain',

grenade

#!/bin/bash

# generate new personal ed25519 ssh key
ssh-keygen -o -a 100 -t ed25519 -f ~/.ssh/id_ed25519 -C "rob thijssen <rthijssen@gmail.com>"

# generate new host cert authority (host_ca) ed25519 ssh key
# used for signing host keys and creating host certs
ssh-keygen -t ed25519 -f manta_host_ca -C manta.network

eval "$(ssh-agent -s)"

scaryguy

-- Firstly, remove PRIMARY KEY attribute of former PRIMARY KEY
ALTER TABLE <table_name> DROP CONSTRAINT <table_name>_pkey;

-- Then change column name of  your PRIMARY KEY and PRIMARY KEY candidates properly.
ALTER TABLE <table_name> RENAME COLUMN <primary_key_candidate> TO id;

chitchcock

Stevey's Google Platforms Rant

I was at Amazon for about six and a half years, and now I've been at Google for that long. One thing that struck me immediately about the two companies -- an impression that has been reinforced almost daily -- is that Amazon does everything wrong, and Google does everything right. Sure, it's a sweeping generalization, but a surprisingly accurate one. It's pretty crazy. There are probably a hundred or even two hundred different ways you can compare the two companies, and Google is superior in all but three of them, if I recall correctly. I actually did a spreadsheet at one point but Legal wouldn't let me show it to anyone, even though recruiting loved it.

I mean, just to give you a very brief taste: Amazon's recruiting process is fundamentally flawed by having teams hire for themselves, so their hiring bar is incredibly inconsistent across teams, despite various efforts they've made to level it out. And their operations are a mess; they don't real