desandro

/* sidebars */
.Trends,
.wtf-module,
.RelatedUsers,
.SignupCallOut,
/* in timeline */
.wtf-module.has-content,
.tweet.dismissable-content,
.LiveVideoHomePageModuleContainer,
.WtfLargeCarouselStreamItem, /* WTF in timeline */

desandro

This is a SCRIPT-8 cassette. Click here to boot it.

desandro

/* sidebars */
.Trends,
.wtf-module,
.RelatedUsers,
.SignupCallOut,
/* in timeline */
.wtf-module.has-content,
.tweet.dismissable-content,
.LiveVideoHomePageModuleContainer,
.WtfLargeCarouselStreamItem, /* WTF in timeline */

desandro

Hello █████,

Thanks for getting in touch and for this tremendous invitation. I'm flattered and excited by the offer.

Representation matters to me. I'm curious: How are you aiming to build a diverse speaker line-up this year? Last years's conference only had 1 female and 1 person of color.

My inclusion rider: I'll join as a speaker if the line-up includes at least ██ women and ██ POC.

I realize putting together a diverse line-up is difficult. As a white male, I'd rather not take up a slot that could better feature someone not like me. Here's a list of people I can recommend.

desandro

uijjkjn  bnnbbv 7nbgn7uy8mh vb hx vghb  Z           bv    VB Aszxsew2W

sxez3w axzas bf71b              1vfu1ch bc  bgb7nvi 76r g `cxzfbc  cv  

dfgv                              n 1    2q1

desandro

desandro

desandro

var paths = document.querySelectorAll('path')

for ( var i=0; i < paths.length; i++ ) {
  var path = paths[i];
  var d = path.getAttribute('d');
  // 10.2.3 -> 10.2 0.3
  d = d.replace( /(\d?\.\d)\.(\d)/g, function( match, $1, $2 ) {
    return $1 + ' 0.' + $2
  });
  // round numbers

desandro

// Get 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, from 1, 2, 3, 4
// ignoring 11, 12, 13 for demo

// using conditionals
function suffixDate( date ) {
  var lastDigit = date % 10;
  if ( lastDigit == 1 ) {
    return date + 'st';
  } else if ( lastDigit == 2 ) {
    return date + 'nd';

desandro

I've been struggling to come up with a good answer to this question: What is good code?

Programming is such a technical subject. It appears to be something you can definitively analyze. But when I think about it through this question, programming seems entirely subjective.

I know good code can be readable, terse, eloquent, standardized, innovative. But it can't be just one of these qualities.

Good code can be highly stylized — utilizing nuanced patterns rarely seen elsewhere. Or good code can be highly structured — following strict guidelines and established conventions. Bad code can be either as well.

I think the answer to "What is good code?" is that there is no answer. You can't put it in words. Like asking "What makes a joke funny?"