Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

Last active March 21, 2024 01:53
Show Gist options
  • Save edburns/e2cb94ba3aebda5a85861718416154cd to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save edburns/e2cb94ba3aebda5a85861718416154cd to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
EB> Summarize this page

The article by Timothy Snyder, dated March 19, 2024, discusses a rally held by Trump in Vandalia, Ohio, where he made a controversial statement about a "bloodbath for the country" if not elected president¹[1]. Here are the key points:

  • Rally Context: The rally began with a tribute to individuals convicted for their roles in the January 6th insurrection, referring to them as "hostages" and "unbelievable patriots," which sets a tone of violence and insurrection as acceptable political behavior.
  • Trump's Speech: He promised to pardon those convicts on his first day if elected and continued to propagate the "big lie" about the rigged 2020 election, reinforcing his narrative of victimhood and martyrdom²[2].
  • Historical Comparison: Snyder draws parallels between Trump's actions and fascist politics, particularly the cult of martyrdom that justifies violence, suggesting Trump's rhetoric is a call for insurrection and violence.
  • Implications: The article warns of the dangers of Trump's rhetoric, urging readers to recognize the seriousness of his statements and the importance of preventing him from gaining power through another insurrection.

The article also includes a comment section where readers express their concerns and plans regarding the potential for violence surrounding the upcoming election.

EB> What will be the consequences for the rule of law if Trump is elected and 
EB> pardons those who are currently convicted for their actions on 2021-01-06?

If a president were to pardon individuals convicted for their actions related to the events of January 6, 2021, it could have several potential consequences for the rule of law:

  1. Precedent Setting: It could set a precedent that individuals can commit crimes, even serious ones against the state, and escape punishment if they have political connections or their actions align with the views of a future president.

  2. Undermining Trust: It could undermine public trust in the justice system. If people perceive that there are two sets of laws - one for the politically connected and one for everyone else - it could erode faith in the fairness and impartiality of the legal system.

  3. Encouraging Lawlessness: If individuals believe they can commit crimes and later be pardoned, it might encourage lawlessness, particularly around politically charged events or issues.

  4. Impacting International Standing: On an international level, it could affect how other countries view the U.S.'s commitment to the rule of law.

  5. Political Polarization: Such a move could further polarize the political climate, as people may view the pardons as a partisan act rather than a principled legal decision.

Please note that these are potential consequences and the actual impact would depend on a variety of factors, including the specifics of the situation and the public's reaction. It's also worth noting that the power to pardon is a constitutional right of the U.S. president, but its use in this manner would be unprecedented and highly controversial.

Source: Conversation with Bing, 3/20/2024 (1) At a rally.... undefined. (2) Right at t.... undefined.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment