Here are the transaction IDs (and links to the block explorers) for the first livenet Ethereum and Ripple Consensus Ledger (RCL) escrowed transfers comprising an Interledger payment.
- Ethereum prepare:
0x00cbb6149b9cfb3cedf280251c3060b2a38776fa7792b578b6f9f39ce5ee0266 - RCL prepare:
7F0A5F16C84568D96DA6A66058CD9EAA881236237642BF7427A458957A752B6B - RCL fulfill:
12A4CAFAE95254844513C5C11488A1195C08DEFF673C97AC74AAC121935DDE36 - Ethereum fulfill:
0xb59dd839ab0b5e7d4e663b7cfc0ddb70eaf73dd2785b3d3a4abdf1a61817007d
SHA-256 Condition: d21df0a06c78f56e9b91275eda081a4b556f799fd41ee15d91a2d87333c20fc1
SHA-256 Fulfillment: 68c5de1cbb0db67a581629bb22d0d2f7a6ff107ddeff6dc5dc2da8373024da7f
On RCL, this uses Escrow Transactions and on Ethereum uses this smart contract.
The payment was sent using ILP Kits using the ledger plugins: ilp-plugin-xrp-escrow and ilp-plugin-ethereum.
Interested? Come join us for the 3rd Interledger Workshop in Berlin on June 1-2. We'll be working on new ledger plugins for Lightning, Zcash, and your preferred ledger! We'll also help you get setup with your very own ILP Kit.
@tuloski Great question. In Interledger payments the hold time for the sender's transfer is slightly longer than the hold time for the next connector, which is longer than the next connector, and so on. So in this case the hold time of the Ethereum escrow contract was longer than the XRP escrow hold time.
Since any transactions on blockchains are always going to be relatively slow, doing Interledger over payment channels would make for a better experience. Stay tuned for more on that ;)