Suppose I have these components in my project:
class MessageHeader extends React.Component { /* ... */ }
class NiceButton extends React.Component { /* ... */ }
class FridgeContents extends React.Component { /* ... */ }
const compose = (f, g) => x => f(g(x)) | |
const Id = x => | |
({ | |
fold: f => f(x), | |
map: f => Id(f(x)) | |
}) | |
Id.of = Id | |
const Tuple = (_1, _2) => |
CertSimple just wrote a blog post arguing ES2017's async/await was the best thing to happen with JavaScript. I wholeheartedly agree.
In short, one of the (few?) good things about JavaScript used to be how well it handled asynchronous requests. This was mostly thanks to its Scheme-inherited implementation of functions and closures. That, though, was also one of its worst faults, because it led to the "callback hell", an seemingly unavoidable pattern that made highly asynchronous JS code almost unreadable. Many solutions attempted to solve that, but most failed. Promises almost did it, but failed too. Finally, async/await is here and, combined with Promises, it solves the problem for good. On this post, I'll explain why that is the case and trace a link between promises, async/await, the do-notation and monads.
First, let's illustrate the 3 styles by implementing
UPD 2: Official standalone Signal Desktop is released!
Install official Signal Desktop, old version and this guide using it should now be considered deprecated.
UPD 1: There is now an easier way with automatic Signal Desktop installer, which also keeps Signal updated.
/* @flow */ | |
// Helper function for matching against an ADT. | |
export function match<A,B>(matcher: A): (match: (matcher: A) => B) => B { | |
return match => match(matcher) | |
} |
Here are the simple steps needed to create a deployment from your local GIT repository to a server based on this in-depth tutorial.
You are developing in a working-copy on your local machine, lets say on the master branch. Most of the time, people would push code to a remote server like github.com or gitlab.com and pull or export it to a production server. Or you use a service like deepl.io to act upon a Web-Hook that's triggered that service.
While the following structure is not an absolute requirement or enforced by the tools, it is a recommendation based on what the JavaScript and in particular Node community at large have been following by convention.
Beyond a suggested structure, no tooling recommendations, or sub-module structure is outlined here.
lib/
is intended for code that can run as-issrc/
is intended for code that needs to be manipulated before it can be used