- 留得住嗎?(retention,可介入) —— 房型、室友、環境、探視、身體因素、照護人員的溝通方式。
- 該不該留?(appropriateness,照護層級) —— 通常由需求決定(失智+安全:走失、跌倒、用藥), 而且往往是長輩本人入住前也同意的。
把「適應」當成長輩個人的失敗,是誤判。 失智者的「適應新環境」能力本身就是缺損的;「想回去」是要調查的訊號,不是判決。
https://www.confighub.com/ (routes to /sign-up)https://confighub.com/ (routes to /sign-up)HTTP 400 Bad Request — "Something went wrong: Invalid parameter: redirect_uri"Issue: Claim→witness obligation: a normative clause must not reach truth unwitnessed (specify → tasks → implement)
Round: adversarial grill, orchestrator = butler; Subject = architect; Griller = griller.
Model: deepseek-flash on both sides (inherited, not overridden).
Bootstrap: both agents seeded --new with (1) aixbdd-tmg/README.md, (2) aixbdd-tmg/domain-model/, (3) tellme/SESSION-BOOTSTRAP.md, then grounded against the consumer evidence (tellme/GAPS.md, ADR 0053, file_store.go, file_store_rollback_test.go) and the seven skill files the issue's root-cause table names.
Structure: subject opening statement → Q1–Q10 (cap 10) → griller VERDICT → subject POST-GRILL POSITION. Relays are verbatim; the orchestrator contributes no content.
Repo: github.com/gosharplite/tellme · PR: #102 · Anchor: #100 (R2 of #92)
Date: 2026-09-18 · Engine: tellme (the first grill round run on tellme; the tmg-grill-round SOP was adapted — an explicit TELL_ME_MODE=<target> on every send and retrieve, because tellme -l ignores -c for session selection; see issue #103)
Subject: architect · Griller: griller · Orchestrator: butler · Cap: 10 questions (concluded after 8)
Outcome: ROUND COMPLETE after Q8 — proceed with changes. Eight verified fixes must be folded into PR #102 before it merges.
Repo: gosharplite/tellme · PR #70 · round 034 034-tool-call-log-parity.
Both agents were initialized by executing the repo SESSION-BOOTSTRAP.md (Steps 1-8) as their first action.
The griller asked ten questions (verbatim); the subject answered; then verdict and post-grill position.
Repo: github.com/gosharplite/tellme · PR: #54 — 024 — Tool resource contract: execute_command + bounded readers (plan + truth)
Subject: architect · Griller: griller · Orchestrator: butler
Protocol: adversarial design review run per tmg-grill-round; both agents bootstrapped via SESSION-BOOTSTRAP.md before the round. The griller declared ROUND COMPLETE after Q8 (verdict delivered as the closing turn). All relays verbatim.
Repo: github.com/gosharplite/tellme · PR: #16 (base dev ← head 005-stdin-piping @ b40db9c)
Subject (grilled): architect · Griller: griller · Orchestrator: butler
Protocol: tmg-grill-round — both agents seeded with --new and executed SESSION-BOOTSTRAP.md Steps 1–8 before the round; questions capped at 10; sequential verbatim relays.
Topic: grill both the diagnosis and the plan of round 005 (stdin piping + TTY-aware output contract), verified against the code, the truth tree, and the tell-me-go reference.
Round: 001-cli-bootstrap-and-config · Repo: gosharplite/tellme
Artifact under review: specs/plans/001-cli-bootstrap-and-config/tasks.md
Subject: architect · Griller: griller · Orchestrator: butler
Question cap: 8 (used 8/8) · Issue: #5
Verdict: proceed with changes
Repo: github.com/gosharplite/tellme · Issue: #4 · Subject: architect · Griller: griller · Orchestrator: butler · Questions: 8/8 · Verdict: proceed with changes
Both agents were seeded with
--newand executedSESSION-BOOTSTRAP.md(Steps 1-8) before the round.