extends will_paginate to play well with Twitter's Bootstrap

will_paginate.rb

# config/initializers/will_paginate.rb

module WillPaginate
  module ActionView
    def will_paginate(collection = nil, options = {})
      options[:renderer] ||= BootstrapLinkRenderer
      super.try :html_safe
    end

    class BootstrapLinkRenderer < LinkRenderer
      protected
      
      def html_container(html)
        tag :div, tag(:ul, html), container_attributes
      end

      def page_number(page)
        tag :li, link(page, page, :rel => rel_value(page)), :class => ('active' if page == current_page)
      end

      def previous_or_next_page(page, text, classname)
        tag :li, link(text, page || '#'), :class => [classname[0..3], classname, ('disabled' unless page)].join(' ')
      end
    end
  end
end

Also, for when there are very many pages:

 def gap
   tag :li, link(super, '#'), :class => 'disabled'
 end

@purcell: Good call - thanks!

I copied/pasted as is and I'm getting the following with will_paginate 3.0.0 and rails 3.0.9:

NameError: uninitialized constant WillPaginate::ActionView::LinkRenderer
~/Sites/Dirot/config/initializers/will_paginate.rb:8:in `<module:ActionView>'
~/Sites/Dirot/config/initializers/will_paginate.rb:2:in `<module:WillPaginate>'
~/Sites/Dirot/config/initializers/will_paginate.rb:1:in `<top (required)>'
~/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/railties-3.0.9/lib/rails/engine.rb:201:in `block (2 levels) in <class:Engine>'
~/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/railties-3.0.9/lib/rails/engine.rb:200:in `each'

Is there a specific version requirement?

I had to shuffle things around a bit, and ended up with the following inside my ApplicationHelper class: https://gist.github.com/1205828

Cool, thanks! Now the app at least starts and the pagination renders, but it doesn't seem to be using the new link renderer. Thoughts? ``` module ApplicationHelper # Based on https://gist.github.com/1182136 class BootstrapLinkRenderer < ::WillPaginate::ViewHelpers::LinkRenderer protected def html_container(html) tag :div, tag(:ul, html), container_attributes end def page_number(page) tag :li, link(page, page, :rel => rel_value(page)), :class => ('active' if page == current_page) end def gap tag :li, link(super, '#'), :class => 'disabled' end def previous_or_next_page(page, text, classname) tag :li, link(text, page || '#'), :class => [classname[0..3], classname, ('disabled' unless page)].join(' ') end end def page_navigation_links(pages) will_paginate(pages, :class => 'pagination', :inner_window => 2, :outer_window => 0, :renderer => BootstrapLinkRenderer, :previous_label => '&larr;'.html_safe, :next_label => '&rarr;'.html_safe) end end ``` ``` # config/initializers/will_paginate.rb module WillPaginate module ActionView def will_paginate(collection = nil, options = {}) options[:renderer] ||= BootstrapLinkRenderer super.try :html_safe end end end ```

…

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Steve Purcell < ***@***.***>wrote: I had to shuffle things around a bit, and ended up with the following inside my `ApplicationHelper` class: https://gist.github.com/1205828 ## Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://gist.github.com/1182136

The key is that my app was already using the page_navigation_links function above to wrap will_paginate, so that's the function I'm using in views. The gist I posted does nothing to override will_paginate's default options, and IIRC I didn't have any luck trying to do so using the original gist.

This is delicious. Thanks!

This does not work with will_paginate (3.0.4) and sinatra.

Checkout this gist. This works with Bootstrap 3 and Will_paginate 3.0.4 and Sinatra https://gist.github.com/expertmind/6410029