Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

View jonathanstiansen's full-sized avatar

Jonathan Stiansen jonathanstiansen

View GitHub Profile
@paridin
paridin / elixir.json
Last active June 14, 2020 19:20
VSCode Elixir Snippets
{
// Place your snippets for elixir here. Each snippet is defined under a snippet name and has a prefix, body and
// description. The prefix is what is used to trigger the snippet and the body will be expanded and inserted. Possible variables are:
// $1, $2 for tab stops, $0 for the final cursor position, and ${1:label}, ${2:another} for placeholders. Placeholders with the
// same ids are connected.
// Example:
// "Print to console": {
// "prefix": "log",
// "body": [
// "console.log('$1');",
const express = require('express');
const app = express();
// Application
app.get('/', function(req, res) {
if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') {
for (var key in require.cache) {
delete require.cache[key];
}
}
@bvaughn
bvaughn / LICENSE.md
Last active November 9, 2023 07:13
Advanced example for manually managing subscriptions in an async-safe way using hooks

The MIT License (MIT)

Copyright © <year> <copyright holders>

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the “Software”), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell

#!/bin/bash
#
# An example hook script to make use of push options.
# The example simply echoes all push options that start with 'echoback='
# and rejects all pushes when the "reject" push option is used.
#
# To enable this hook, rename this file to "pre-receive".
# check if back merges are happening from important branches
echo "checking for bad branch names"
@mdang
mdang / RAILS_CHEATSHEET.md
Last active May 13, 2024 14:04
Ruby on Rails Cheatsheet

Ruby on Rails Cheatsheet

Architecture

Create a new application

Install the Rails gem if you haven't done so before

@Restuta
Restuta / the-bind-problem.jsx
Last active March 16, 2024 00:22
React, removeEventListener and bind(this) gotcha
/* Sometimes it's pretty easy to run ito troubles with React ES6 components.
Consider the following code: */
class EventStub extends Component {
componentDidMount() {
window.addEventListener('resize', this.onResize.bind(this)); //notice .bind
}
componentWillUnmount() {
window.removeEventListener('resize', this.onResize.bind(this));
@SzymonPobiega
SzymonPobiega / gist:5220595
Last active April 25, 2024 17:19
DDD/CQRS/ES/Architecture videos

If you have two days to learn the very basics of modelling, Domain-Driven Design, CQRS and Event Sourcing, here's what you should do:

In the evenings read the [Domain-Driven Design Quickly Minibook]{http://www.infoq.com/minibooks/domain-driven-design-quickly}. During the day watch following great videos (in this order):

  1. Eric Evans' [What I've learned about DDD since the book]{http://www.infoq.com/presentations/ddd-eric-evans}
  2. Eric Evans' [Strategic Design - Responsibility Traps]{http://www.infoq.com/presentations/design-strategic-eric-evans}
  3. Udi Dahan's [Avoid a Failed SOA: Business & Autonomous Components to the Rescue]{http://www.infoq.com/presentations/SOA-Business-Autonomous-Components}
  4. Udi Dahan's [Command-Query Responsibility Segregation]{http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Command-Query-Responsibility-Segregation}
  5. Greg Young's [Unshackle Your Domain]{http://www.infoq.com/presentations/greg-young-unshackle-qcon08}
  6. Eric Evans' [Acknowledging CAP at the Root -- in the Domain Model]{ht
@chitchcock
chitchcock / 20111011_SteveYeggeGooglePlatformRant.md
Created October 12, 2011 15:53
Stevey's Google Platforms Rant

Stevey's Google Platforms Rant

I was at Amazon for about six and a half years, and now I've been at Google for that long. One thing that struck me immediately about the two companies -- an impression that has been reinforced almost daily -- is that Amazon does everything wrong, and Google does everything right. Sure, it's a sweeping generalization, but a surprisingly accurate one. It's pretty crazy. There are probably a hundred or even two hundred different ways you can compare the two companies, and Google is superior in all but three of them, if I recall correctly. I actually did a spreadsheet at one point but Legal wouldn't let me show it to anyone, even though recruiting loved it.

I mean, just to give you a very brief taste: Amazon's recruiting process is fundamentally flawed by having teams hire for themselves, so their hiring bar is incredibly inconsistent across teams, despite various efforts they've made to level it out. And their operations are a mess; they don't real