mrmurphy

open Pom;

type middleware('context, 'result) =
  (Express.Request.t, Express.Response.t, 'context) =>
  pomWithError('result, Express.complete);

type handler('context) =
  (Express.Request.t, Express.Response.t, 'context) => pom(Express.complete);

let _onError500 =

christippett

#!/bin/sh -e
IGNORE_FILES=$(ls -p | grep -v /)
TRACKING_BUCKET="$COMMIT_STATE_BUCKET/$REPO_NAME/$BRANCH_NAME"

detect_changed_folders() {
    gsutil cp gs://$TRACKING_BUCKET/LAST_COMMIT . &> /dev/null || true
    last_commit_sha=`cat LAST_COMMIT 2> /dev/null || git rev-list --max-parents=0 HEAD`
    echo "Detecting changes from last build: $last_commit_sha"
    folders=`git diff --name-only "$last_commit_sha" | sort -u | awk 'BEGIN {FS="/"} {print $1}' | uniq`
    export changed_components=$folders

jamiebuilds

async function validatePassword(password: string): string[] {
  let errors = []

  // 1. Don't regex for things you can trivially express in code
  // -----------------------------------------------------------
  // For example, we could have written this as `/^.{0,7}$/` but that's not
  // nearly as clear as checking the length of the string.

  if (password.length < 8) {
    errors.push("Password must be at least 8 characters long")

dillonchanis

@layer utilities {
  .text-gradient {
    background-clip: text;
    -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent;
  }
}

0xabad1dea

Risk Assessment of GitHub Copilot

0xabad1dea, July 2021

this is a rough draft and may be updated with more examples

GitHub was kind enough to grant me swift access to the Copilot test phase despite me @'ing them several hundred times about ICE. I would like to examine it not in terms of productivity, but security. How risky is it to allow an AI to write some or all of your code?

Ultimately, a human being must take responsibility for every line of code that is committed. AI should not be used for "responsibility washing." However, Copilot is a tool, and workers need their tools to be reliable. A carpenter doesn't have to