Dear Juno community. We are the fund like team which has many clients with high expectations for the Cosmos ecosystem in general.
We consider Prop16 is one of the most important discussions which is going to remain in the blockchains history.
{ | |
"juno_address": "juno10l3rfs5eya90utgm6g3lrtf6pzff3mucgdylk0", | |
"juno_balance": "58463855131" | |
} | |
{ | |
"juno_address": "juno10nggdh8d2z3v2q6mqw7f0vw0r740m25r30g45l", | |
"juno_balance": "61352549126" | |
} | |
{ | |
"juno_address": "juno10p4snfgpwumjxyckpgu3q98qcsrpljsmrsd0dv", |
Thank you for taking the time to read our claims. Since then, we have seen various opinions on Twitter and Telegram.
In this Medium, we would like to address some of the questions many of you have raised. We are not from an English-speaking country, and we are not perfect at English.
Dear Juno Community
As for Stakedrop Remediation for GAME/CCN/Debo (hereinafter referred to as “Burn Prop”), discussions are being held to burn our assets while missing the points to be considered. In this statement, we would like to summarize the information necessary for all Juno community members to make a factually accurate decision and share our assertion of what we think about it.
In response to the question, "Reply 1 thing we should proof to release funds from escrow" in Whale Giveaway Day4, the most common comment was "prove that our clients are real".
Here is the proof that we have clients in our services.
This is the BTC payment history made by them to join CCN.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19StdwSh2IHkJdNGCtkf--8ILuENEwcE3XiTcupRDeaA/edit#gid=0
We took a survey of our clients regarding the 50:50 asset split with the community.
We received 5,580 responses and found that 97.7% support to split JUNO 50/50 with the community.
The question and options are as follows.
Q. Do you agree with the 50% 50% plan to submit to the Juno community?
We declare a solid opposition to it. We hope all people can read this statement to the end.
The precedent of changing the balance without the consent of the address owner means that all property in Juno essentially belongs to the Juno community, making it clear that Juno is a communist chain. For all investors who love capitalism, the precedent of not granting ownership and sovereignty of personal property in Juno is, above all, repugnant and will significantly hinder the future development of Juno.
In the past, various communist countries throughout history began with the seizure of the assets of the wealthy by the masses. Communism eventually led to a central dictatorship.
Therefore, such a Prop that questions fundamental principles that will significantly affect the future of Juno needs to be discussed more carefully. In reality, however, the content of Prop 20 has not gone through the proper process, is inadequate, and is lacking in many things.
We voted No on Prop20. In this article, we describe the reasons.
Prop20 states that CCN is an exchange because of the article we submitted. It is stated as if we admitted we are an exchange. This kind of misleading representation is not appropriate. We did not offer any kind of exchange service. We disagree with the assertion that we should be excluded from the stakedrop on the ground that we’re an exchange.
It is so contradictory that their only evidence that we are an exchange is the article we published, while they, who created Prop20 such as Dimi, Frey, wolf, Jabbey, etc., claimed that we were not trustworthy at all from Prop16 onward.