https://github.com/moby/moby/blob/master/pkg/namesgenerator/names-generator.go
The current list contains 438 sessions. The list will be updated regularly, at least once a day during reinvent. Last update: 2018-12-02 06:58 +00:00
Title | Description | Video |
---|---|---|
[NEW LANUCH!] Building modern apps using Amazon DynamoDB transactions (DAT374) | DynamoDB transactions enables developers to maintain correctness of their data at scale by adding atomicity and isolation guarantees for multi-item conditional ... | {:target="_blank"} |
[NEW LAUNCH!] AWS License Manager Deep Dive (CMP393) | AWS License Manager is a new service that makes it easy to bring your existing licenses to the AWS cloud and reduce licensing costs. This service offers a ... | [](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7pdaM3OAAQ "AWS re:Invent 2018: [NEW LA |
I was at Amazon for about six and a half years, and now I've been at Google for that long. One thing that struck me immediately about the two companies -- an impression that has been reinforced almost daily -- is that Amazon does everything wrong, and Google does everything right. Sure, it's a sweeping generalization, but a surprisingly accurate one. It's pretty crazy. There are probably a hundred or even two hundred different ways you can compare the two companies, and Google is superior in all but three of them, if I recall correctly. I actually did a spreadsheet at one point but Legal wouldn't let me show it to anyone, even though recruiting loved it.
I mean, just to give you a very brief taste: Amazon's recruiting process is fundamentally flawed by having teams hire for themselves, so their hiring bar is incredibly inconsistent across teams, despite various efforts they've made to level it out. And their operations are a mess; they don't really have SREs and they make engineers pretty much do everything,
A guide for reviewing code and having your code reviewed.
Peer code reviews are the single biggest thing you can do to improve your code - Jeff Atwood
Code review is an important part of a team's development process. It helps to:
- disseminate knowledge about the codebase/technology/techniques across teams
- increase awareness of the features being developed
# MIT License | |
# Copyright (c) 2016 Chandler Abraham | |
# Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy | |
# of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal | |
# in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights | |
# to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell | |
# copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is | |
# furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: |
Update-ExecutionPolicy Unrestricted -Force | |
# Base | |
cinst BoxStarter.Chocolatey | |
cinst BoxStarter.WinConfig | |
# Chocolatey | |
cinst ChocolateyPackageUpdater | |
# Windows 8.1 Settings and Options |
a4b.amazonaws.com | |
acm-pca.amazonaws.com | |
acm.amazonaws.com | |
alexa-appkit.amazon.com | |
alexa-connectedhome.amazon.com | |
amazonmq.amazonaws.com | |
apigateway.amazonaws.com | |
application-autoscaling.amazonaws.com | |
appstream.application-autoscaling.amazonaws.com | |
appsync.amazonaws.com |
Availability Availability is the proportion of time that the system is functional and working. It is usually measured as a percentage of uptime. Application errors, infrastructure problems, and system load can all reduce availability.
A cloud application should have a service level objective (SLO) that clearly defines the expected availability, and how the availability is measured. When defining availability, look at the critical path. The web front-end might be able to service client requests, but if every transaction fails because it can't connect to the database, the application is not available to users.
Availability is often described in terms of "9s" — for example, "four 9s" means 99.99% uptime. The following table shows the potential cumulative downtime at different availability levels.
99% 1.68 hours 7.2 hours 3.65 days
# 1. export bookmarks | |
# 2. awk -f cbdd.awk bookmarks_12_4_16.html > uniq.html | |
# 3. import uniq.html | |
BEGIN { FS = " " } | |
$2 ~ /^HREF/ { | |
if (!($2 in seen)) { | |
seen[$2] | |
print $0 |
When running ECS on EC2, the EC2 instances hosting the containers need a role. This role gives them permission to, among other things, pull images from ECR, manage tasks in the ECS API, and put logs into cloudwatch.
When running in Fargate, there are no EC2 instances hosting your containers, so these permissions have to go somewhere. This is called a Task Execution Role. It gives the Fargate service the same permissions the EC2 instance would need. This role is not required when running tasks on EC2 backed ECS.
This is a role used by the ECS service itself to perform functions such as managing load balancer configuration, doing service discovery, as well as attaching network interfaces when using the awsvpc
network mode. There is only one of these per account.