No. | inline type |
Out-of-line definition disposition | Out-of-line definition linkage |
---|---|---|---|
1.1 | GNU plain inline [1] |
Not emitted | N/A |
1.2 | GNU static inline [1] |
Emitted only when inlining fails | internal |
1.3 | GNU extern inline [1] |
Not emitted | N/A |
2.1 | C99 plain inline [1] |
Not emitted | N/A |
2.2 | C99 static inline [1] |
Emitted only when inlining fails | internal |
2.3 | C99 extern inline [1] |
Always emitted | external, strong |
3.1 | C++ plain inline [1] |
Emitted only when inlining fails | external, weak [2] |
3.2 | C++ static inline [1] |
Emitted only when inlining fails | internal |
People
:bowtie: |
😄 :smile: |
😆 :laughing: |
---|---|---|
😊 :blush: |
😃 :smiley: |
:relaxed: |
😏 :smirk: |
😍 :heart_eyes: |
😘 :kissing_heart: |
😚 :kissing_closed_eyes: |
😳 :flushed: |
😌 :relieved: |
😆 :satisfied: |
😁 :grin: |
😉 :wink: |
😜 :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye: |
😝 :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes: |
😀 :grinning: |
😗 :kissing: |
😙 :kissing_smiling_eyes: |
😛 :stuck_out_tongue: |
When I use git, I'm scared I'll break something. I just talked to an open source celebrity who has used git for 3-4 years who avoids using the CLI because he's afraid he'll break something, and uses Tower when possible. I recently had a client accidentally delete their work because they didn't understand git. My fear of breaking something is well-founded.
You can't put a price on the confidence that source control is supposed to give you. That confidence suffers when people are afraid of causing irreparable damage during normal use.
This article lists a few ideas on what git can do to improve.