Comparison table for the 5-Pillar, RICE, 3 Buckets, and MoSCoW prioritization frameworks, all in the context of product management:
Framework | When to Use | When Not to Use | Benefits | Cons |
---|---|---|---|---|
5-Pillar | Ideal for comprehensive product strategy evaluation and decision-making. | Less suited for quick, simple decisions or small-scale projects. | Offers a holistic view across Reach, Customer Impact, Business Impact, Validation, and Ease. | Can be complex and require significant cross-functional input and data analysis. |
RICE | Best for quantifiable and data-driven decision-making. | Not ideal when impact is difficult to measure or quantify. | Provides a clear, quantifiable method to assess Reach, Impact, Confidence, and Effort. | May overlook qualitative aspects; relies on accurate and available data for scoring. |
3 Buckets | Useful for initial sorting of features or ideas in |