This is inspired by https://fasterthanli.me/blog/2020/a-half-hour-to-learn-rust/
the command zig run my_code.zig will compile and immediately run your Zig
program. Each of these cells contains a zig program that you can try to run
(some of them contain compile-time errors that you can comment out to play
with)
I've been using a lot of Ansible lately and while almost everything has been great, finding a clean way to implement ansible-vault wasn't immediately apparent.
What I decided on was the following: put your secret information into a vars file, reference that vars file from your task, and encrypt the whole vars file using ansible-vault encrypt.
Let's use an example: You're writing an Ansible role and want to encrypt the spoiler for the movie Aliens.
There is a long standing issue in Ruby where the net/http library by default does not check the validity of an SSL certificate during a TLS handshake. Rather than deal with the underlying problem (a missing certificate authority, a self-signed certificate, etc.) one tends to see bad hacks everywhere. This can lead to problems down the road.
From what I can see the OpenSSL library that Rails Installer delivers has no certificate authorities defined. So, let's go fetch some from the curl website. And since this is for ruby, why don't we download and install the file with a ruby script?
| group :production do | |
| gem 'unicorn' | |
| # Enable gzip compression on heroku, but don't compress images. | |
| gem 'heroku-deflater' | |
| # Heroku injects it if it's not in there already | |
| gem 'rails_12factor' | |
| end |
The default ephemeral port range on macOS/OSX is 49152-65535, which is only 16,383 ports:
$ sysctl -a | grep portrange
net.inet.ip.portrange.lowfirst: 1023
net.inet.ip.portrange.lowlast: 600
net.inet.ip.portrange.first: 49152
net.inet.ip.portrange.last: 65535
net.inet.ip.portrange.hifirst: 49152
net.inet.ip.portrange.hilast: 65535
zoomAutenticationTool can be used to escalat
Last night, Brian Shirai unilaterally "ended" the RubySpec project, a sub-project of Rubinius (the alternative Ruby implementation which Brian was paid to work on full-time from 2007 to 2013). The blog post describing his reasons for "ending" the project led to a big discussion on Hacker News.
When a single, competing Ruby implementation tells that you its test suite is the One True Way, you should be skeptical. Charles Nutter, Ruby core committer and JRuby head honcho, spent a lot of time last night on Twitter talking to people about what this decision means. He's probably too busy and certainly too nice of a guy to write about what is a political issue in the Ruby community, so I'm going to do it on behalf of all the new or intermediate Rubyists out there that are confused by Brian's decision and what it me
I'm a fan of MiniTest::Spec. It strikes a nice balance between the simplicity of TestUnit and the readable syntax of RSpec. When I first switched from RSpec to MiniTest::Spec, one thing I was worried I would miss was the ability to add matchers. (A note in terminology: "matchers" in MiniTest::Spec refer to something completely different than "matchers" in RSpec. I won't get into it, but from now on, let's use the proper term: "expectations").
Let's take a look in the code (I'm specifically referring to the gem, not the standard library that's built into Ruby 1.9):
# minitest/spec.rb
module MiniTest::Expectations