A short summary of the current status of the project is helpful for understanding why the sequence of spending is what I've proposed below.
I a package several years ago that propvides the skeleton for what I'm suggesting in this proposal.
The package, called stellarphot, currently does these functions, which use a broad range of astropy functionality:
I hereby claim:
To claim this, I am signing this object:
| # Write the benchmarking functions here. | |
| # See "Writing benchmarks" in the asv docs for more information. | |
| from pathlib import Path | |
| from tempfile import TemporaryDirectory | |
| import numpy as np | |
| import bottleneck as bn | |
| from astropy.io import fits |
| ### Define a function with kwargs | |
| def kwargs_fun(**kwargs): | |
| # Just print the content of kwargs | |
| print(kwargs) | |
| # Now call kwargs_fun in a few goofy ways and see what happens: |
| """ | |
| Code for solving a second order differntial equation using RK2, I then modified | |
| it to solve for an initial launch velocity given a final target height for a""" | |
| Code for solving a second order differntial equation using RK2, I then modified | |
| it to solve for an initial launch velocity given a final target height for a | |
| projectile fired straight up. | |
| """ | |
| import numpy as np | |
| import matplotlib.pyplot as plt |