neofob/quez.txt

## quez.txt
Creating model...
Restoring weights...

Human: What Happens If Trump Wins His Bet on Demagoguery?
Alice: I'm sorry, Your Honor.

Human: How long can we go on like this?
Alice: Well, in that situation there was not an expectation of privacy that he would not have given notice of that event.

Human: Do your best to try to keep party labels out of the debate, because it’s really important, okay?
Alice: Well, Your Honor, that is not the question here.

Human: Was he a genius or a crackpot?
Alice: It was not.

Human: Why wouldn't you dedicate yourself to public service?
Alice: Well, there would be nothing in the record to indicate that he was not in privity with that person.

Human: What's the purpose of a country if you're not going to have defensive and health care?
Alice: Well, that is a different question, Your Honor, and that is the reason why we are here on that issue.

Human: Are you for the invasion of Iraq?
Alice: Is that it?

Human: How about Iran?
Alice: Your Honor, I would say that that is not the purpose that has been presented to the Court in this case, and there has been no federalism in this area.

Human: Do you have the same opportunity today as you had years ago?
Alice: I don't know what the Court of Appeals has done here, and I don't believe there's any question that the district court did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate that question at all, and I would like to point out that in this case, there was not a full and fair opportunity for the Court to stay its hand until there had been no action on the part of Government for some kind of immunized testimony, it would indicate that it could not have been subject to prosecution for personal injuries because of

Human: What's going on? What's going on?
Alice: --Well, that was the basis for the Court's decision.

Human: Well, what did they find?
Alice: They didn't seek an indictment.

Human: I keep asking, how long will we go on defending South Korea from North Korea without payment?
Alice: No, sir.

Human: Isn't it really ridiculous when you think of it?
Alice: Justice Kennedy, I think that the Court's decision in Michigan v. Louisiana would apply.

Human: You know, when you put out policy, like a 14-point plan? A lot of times in the first hour of negotiation, that 14-point plan goes astray, but you may end up with a better deal. That's the way it works. That's the way really life works. When I do a deal, I don't say, "Oh, here's 14 points." I got out and do it. I don't sit down and talk about 14 points.
Alice: And that's why I ask the question.

Human: Why aren’t we letting ISIS go and fight Assad and then we pick up the remnants?
Alice: Could you do that?

Human: If you’re in the White House, who wants to take a vacation? You’re in the White House!… What’s better than the White House? Why these vacations?
Alice: Well, Justice Souter, I think they would.

Human:
	Creating model...
	Restoring weights...

	Human: What Happens If Trump Wins His Bet on Demagoguery?
	Alice: I'm sorry, Your Honor.

	Human: How long can we go on like this?
	Alice: Well, in that situation there was not an expectation of privacy that he would not have given notice of that event.

	Human: Do your best to try to keep party labels out of the debate, because it’s really important, okay?
	Alice: Well, Your Honor, that is not the question here.

	Human: Was he a genius or a crackpot?
	Alice: It was not.

	Human: Why wouldn't you dedicate yourself to public service?
	Alice: Well, there would be nothing in the record to indicate that he was not in privity with that person.

	Human: What's the purpose of a country if you're not going to have defensive and health care?
	Alice: Well, that is a different question, Your Honor, and that is the reason why we are here on that issue.

	Human: Are you for the invasion of Iraq?
	Alice: Is that it?

	Human: How about Iran?
	Alice: Your Honor, I would say that that is not the purpose that has been presented to the Court in this case, and there has been no federalism in this area.

	Human: Do you have the same opportunity today as you had years ago?
	Alice: I don't know what the Court of Appeals has done here, and I don't believe there's any question that the district court did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate that question at all, and I would like to point out that in this case, there was not a full and fair opportunity for the Court to stay its hand until there had been no action on the part of Government for some kind of immunized testimony, it would indicate that it could not have been subject to prosecution for personal injuries because of

	Human: What's going on? What's going on?
	Alice: --Well, that was the basis for the Court's decision.

	Human: Well, what did they find?
	Alice: They didn't seek an indictment.

	Human: I keep asking, how long will we go on defending South Korea from North Korea without payment?
	Alice: No, sir.

	Human: Isn't it really ridiculous when you think of it?
	Alice: Justice Kennedy, I think that the Court's decision in Michigan v. Louisiana would apply.

	Human: You know, when you put out policy, like a 14-point plan? A lot of times in the first hour of negotiation, that 14-point plan goes astray, but you may end up with a better deal. That's the way it works. That's the way really life works. When I do a deal, I don't say, "Oh, here's 14 points." I got out and do it. I don't sit down and talk about 14 points.
	Alice: And that's why I ask the question.

	Human: Why aren’t we letting ISIS go and fight Assad and then we pick up the remnants?
	Alice: Could you do that?

	Human: If you’re in the White House, who wants to take a vacation? You’re in the White House!… What’s better than the White House? Why these vacations?
	Alice: Well, Justice Souter, I think they would.

	Human: