Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@ontouchstart
Last active January 30, 2019 18:30
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save ontouchstart/c6b4069974ae74b2c78610302fb83ea9 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save ontouchstart/c6b4069974ae74b2c78610302fb83ea9 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
What we are doing

Three things

What we are doing

For my part, what I am doing now is to figure out what the community of Future Text Connect (which I am going to call the FTC) 2019 is by collecting data on

  • Public profiles that are related to the community (web sites, blogs, etc)
  • Digital artifacts created and maintained by the members (images, videos, code repositories)
  • Community groups and communication channels (skype, slack, github, gitlab, Google Docs, Google colab, etc)

I am interested in specific digital artifacts instead of philosophical principles. My own work, however, is platform independent and data driven.

@ontouchstart
Copy link
Author

From:

Steve

Dear Frode and company,

What am I working on?

I am building Effective.af (code): secure task management software with a bevy of unique features, designed to enable large numbers of participants and projects to join forces -- especially activists trying to change the world.

I imagine a world in which anyone, anywhere can create a highly productive, volunteer-driven, 100-person organization -- in 1 hour.

Effective.af screenshot

Its features and benefits are centered around making groups of humans radically more effective and secure:

  • Speed, Coordination, & Semi-automation => Global Superorganism
    • Assign tasks from one project to another project
    • Auto-assign tasks to users by skill set (coming soon)
    • Self-healing: auto-reassign idle tasks to users with the appropriate skill set (coming soon)
    • Assign tasks to always-on automated chat bots (coming soon)
    • Mass invite users by skill set (coming soon)
    • Auto-estimated due dates for tasks whose parent tasks (or above) have been given a due date
  • Structure & Efficiency
    • Each project contains a hierarchy of tasks
      • Easily express which tasks depend upon others
    • Each task has its own end-to-end encrypted chat room for discussing or getting help with that task
      • Attach files and links to tasks (coming soon)
    • Per-user unified task list, thus answering the most critical question that task management software answer, and one that basically never is: "what should I work on right now?"
  • Security, Privacy, & Anonymity
    • End-to-end encrypted tasks (coming soon)
    • Tor integration by default; access server as an Onion Service
    • Ability to invite people not yet on the system via URL without them needing to specify their email to join
    • Open source & self-hostable

How do we want to collaborate?

  1. Orientation via demo | For starters, Duke and I were thinking that it would be great for our next meeting to give each participant the opportunity to spend 1-3 minutes doing a very quick demo of what they're building. Now that I think about it, after this next meeting it would also be cool to have each subsequent meeting's new people perform such a demo for us. All of this will help make it clearer which people in particular should be talking to/collaboritng with the demoer.

  2. Extra-meeting working groups | Outside of the existing Tuesday meetings, which I suppose can be focused on on-boarding new people, the aforementioned very-brief demos, and reporting relevant project progress to one another, we should also have more serious work-oriented sessions of some sort, perhaps once a week. Addition specifics will depend on the nature of the integration, so let us first answer "what do we want to achieve?" -- specifically what we want to present in November -- then answer "how should we work together to achieve X?"

(In general, if you're building something exciting and new, send me a link to your demo or app! I am happy to try it out and give you feedback, provided that I can run it on Linux, either natively or in a web browser.)

What do we want to achieve?

Some combination of the following:

  1. Agreement upon open specs that enable cross-app integrations or interactions of various sorts could be hugely valuable. If the debates become too trivial or laborious, I say we ask Frode to make the final decision as to what each spec says.

  2. If #1 enables us to, say, pass JSON between apps in order to trigger various behavior, I am interested in building functionality exposed as APIs and/or chat bots that is meant to augment various tools relevant to the future of text and beyond.

  3. Let's do #1 and #2 so that we have something epic to demo for this year's Future of Text Symposium. We should figure out what we want this to be as soon as possible, and we should each do a gut check to make sure it's something we are sufficiently serious about and excited about the goal we set!

@ontouchstart
Copy link
Author

ontouchstart commented Jan 22, 2019

From

Shane Gibson

What I am doing?

I am working in concert with Frode and Chris⋮ to bring an improved set of authoring and reading tools to the WordPress platform which adhere to “Englebartian” principles.

It is my intention to carve out some time to work on a new tool that will enable two-way linking of text in a browser. In essence, when a backlink to content is created, I would like to enable a method for the original author of the content that is being linked to to be notified and be able to avow or disavow the link to create a more interconnected network of content which is known among authors and readers. Currently, some level of disavowal is available from certain search engines, but there is no method of explicitly endorsing certain links

How I want to collaborate

I am available to provide user testing and feedback on the different projects other members of the working group are engaged in. I would like to have the same available for me!

What do I want to achieve?

In an ideal world, it would be fantastic if my “backlink 2.0” idea were able to be included in the specification for the HTML tag. Allowing for these deeper connections would enable true decentralization of content and the ability for people to craft their own social and content networks without having to resort to the walled gardens of the current gatekeepers whose motivations may be suspect (Facebook, Twitter, etc).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment