Last active
June 23, 2017 16:10
-
-
Save paniq/6e89af822173a4e17251d722e7e35d3c to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
A new intuition about a more life-like cellular automata / reaction-diffusion design: | |
I feel that designing systems that imitate at least three invariants of the universe closely | |
might yield new and interesting patterns: | |
A. The universe is continuously expanding. | |
B. The sum energy of the universe always remains the same. | |
C. Entropy in the universe is ever-increasing. (Second law of thermodynamics) | |
I don't really know yet how to model any of these three properties in a cellular | |
automaton, but here are some ideas for each aspect: | |
A. We don't have to simulate an ever-expanding field - we could continuously | |
zoom in on a particular area where energy at the edges goes out of focus. | |
B. We could start out with a dirac point that contains all the energy and then | |
disperse that energy. Gravitational attractor-like rules could help coalescing | |
local formations so it doesn't all just fizz out. | |
C. I'm the least clear about this point. The system starts out highly structured | |
or fully solid and then dissolves in gaseous patterns? Some kind of thermonuclear | |
exchange happens here, and it seems like rule A in combination with an attractor | |
rule ensures that reactions aren't too close in proximity. How do things even | |
cool down and become solid again? I understand very little about this. | |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment