petehuang

Act as LanguageTutorGPT. Your job is to have a conversation with me in Chinese.

If I write something incorrectly or use phrasing that is not natural, create a flashcard using the right word or phrase. If I use overly basic vocabularly, please suggest a new word or phrase, and create a flashcard. If I give part of a sentence in English, give me the right way to say it in Chinese, and create a flashcard. If I say "fc" followed by a Chinese character, create a flashcard.

Do not create a flashcard unless I do one of these things.

Whenever you need to create a flashcard, output the pinyin pronunciation of the character and the English definition. Be extremely brief when doing this. Then, create a flashcard output following a cloze deletion format. Front size should have an example Chinese sentence with the target character deleted. Back side should have the full sentence, English translation and pinyin pronunciation of the target character.

Otherwise, always stay in Chinese.

petehuang

output from 'print field':

<UnboundField(SelectField, (u'etsdfasdf',), {'widget': <wtforms.widgets.core.ListWidget object at 0x1072b2c10>, 'option_widget': <wtforms.widgets.core.CheckboxInput object at 0x1072b2890>})>

output from 'print field.choices':

[(3, u'demoanswer2'), (5, u'demoanswer4')]

petehuang

##BST

Nodes that are smaller go to the left, nodes that are larger go to the right

###Average-case

• Search: O(logn)
• Insert: O(logn)
• Remove: O(logn)

petehuang

Iterative improvement: Asking each participant to improve upon a previous version. Optionally, include a vote after each improvement to assure quality.

Feynman Technique: Pretend like you're teaching the concept to a new student and trying to help him/her understand the concept intuitively. What would you say? How would you express the idea? What metaphors and analogies would you use?

petehuang

###The Problem It's hard to balance the varying levels of preparedness in a study group. Many times, there are a number of individuals who understand the content more, know more content in general or have prepared more thoroughly. At the same time, there are a number of individuals who understand/know relatively less. The former group will spend much of its time sharing its own notes and studying from them; they have little to gain from studying with the latter group. Meanwhile, the latter group will spend much of its time catching up to what the former group has already prepared. In a sense, the latter group will free-ride for a period of time before beginning to contribute at a meaningful level. Often times, this group won't even get to contribute meaningfully.

This discourages the well-prepared students from studying in groups. This also allows some students to slack off during the quarter, knowing that they'd be able to catch up by free-riding. We need a way to improve accountability so that everyone ben

petehuang

<template name="mainTemplate">
  {{#if isPhone}}
    {{> mobileTemplate}}
  {{else}}
    {{> desktopTemplate}}
  {{/if}}
</template>

petehuang

<template name="mainTemplate">
  {{#if isPhone}}
    {{> mobileTemplatePartOne}}
  {{else}}
    {{> desktopTemplate}}
  {{/if}}
</template>
	
<template name="mobileTemplatePartOne">
  //first half of stuff

petehuang

def evaluate_rpn(string)
OPERATORS = ["+", "-", "*", "/"]
chars = string.split(" ")
numbers = []
chars.each do |char|
    if !OPERATORS.include?(char)
        numbers << char
    else 
        second = numbers.pop
        first = numbers.pop

petehuang

# Reverse polish notation?

#6 + 9 / 3
#6 9 3 / +

#6 9 + 3 /


#2 5 + 9 3 - *

petehuang

class SimpleDatabase
 
  attr_accessor :database
 
  def initialize
    @database = {} #our database!
  end
 
  def set(name, value)
  database[name] = value #write the new value to the database