ralphbean

sudo yum -y install python-virtualenv

virtualenv my-venv
source my-venv/bin/activate

git clone url-for-bloom
cd bloom

python setup.py develop
./bin/bloom-generate

relrod

diff --git a/fpaste b/fpaste
index 7a2eefe..d33461a 100755
--- a/fpaste
+++ b/fpaste
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ VERSION = '0.3.8.1'
 USER_AGENT = 'fpaste/' + VERSION
 SET_DESCRIPTION_IF_EMPTY = 1  # stdin, clipboard, sysinfo
 # FPASTE_URL = 'http://fpaste.org/'
-FPASTE_URL = 'http://paste.fedoraproject.org/'
+FPASTE_URL = 'http://modernpaste.fedorainfracloud.org/api/paste'

sanjayankur31

VPN access

In a terminal:

sudo openconnect --juniper uhvpn.herts.ac.uk

It'll ask for credentials. Staff will use: <your studynet id>@staff while students will use: <your studynet id>@student

matthewbednarski

[Default Applications]
x-scheme-handler/mailto=mutt.desktop;

nagapavan

function npm-freeze() {
    # npm ls | grep -E "^(├|└)─" | cut -d" " -f2 | awk -v quote='"' 'BEGIN { FS = "@" } ; { print quote $1 quote,":",quote $2 quote"," }' | sed -e 's/ :/:/g'
    entries=`npm list --depth=0 -prod true "$@" 2>/dev/null | grep -v "UNMET PEER DEPENDENCY\|peer dep missing" | grep -E "^(├|└)─" | cut -d" " -f2` 
    echo '"dependencies" : {'
    for entry in ${entries}; do
        if [[ $entry =~ ^@.* ]]; then
            # echo $entry
            echo $entry | awk -v quote='"' -v attherate='@' 'BEGIN { FS = "@" }; { print quote attherate $1$2 quote,":",quote $3 quote"," }'
        else

rcoup

#!/bin/bash
set -e

# Usage:
#   rsync_parallel.sh [--parallel=N] [rsync args...]
# 
# Options:
#   --parallel=N	Use N parallel processes for transfer. Defaults to 10.
#
# Notes:

kogakure

*.acn
*.acr
*.alg
*.aux
*.bak
*.bbl
*.bcf
*.blg
*.brf
*.bst

fmela

/*
 * Copyright (c) 2009-2017, Farooq Mela
 * All rights reserved.
 *
 * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
 * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
 *
 * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
 *    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
 * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright

Soft

key_move_song_up = 'K'
key_move_song_down = 'J'
key_next_found_position = 'n'
key_prev_found_position = 'N'
key_prev_column = 260 'h'
key_next_column = 261 'l'
key_lyrics = '.'
key_home = 262 'g'
key_end = 360 'G'

mbbx6spp

Gerrit vs Github: for code review and codebase management

Sure, Github wins on the UI. Hands down. But, despite my initial annoyance with Gerrit when I first started using it almost a year ago, I am now a convert. Fully. Let me tell you why.

Note: This is an opinionated (on purpose) piece. I assume your preferences are like mine on certain ideas, such as:

• Fast-forward submits to the target branch are better than allowing merge commits to the target branch. The reason I personally prefer this is that, even if a non-conflicting merge to the target branch is possible, the fact that the review/pull request is not up to date with the latest on the target branch means feature branch test suite runs in the CI pipeline reporting on the review/PR may not be accurate. Another minor point is that forced merge commits are annoying as fuck (opinion) and clutter up Git log histories unnecessarily and I prefer clean histories.
• Atomic/related changes all in one commit is something worth striving for. Having your dev