This script will download and replace ~/Applications/VSCode-linux-x64
with the latest VS Code Insiders.
- Install
jq
: https://stedolan.github.io/jq/download/ - Place
update-code
somewhere in yourPATH
import { useReducer, useEffect } from 'react'; | |
import { useSwipeable, SwipeableHandlers, EventData } from 'react-swipeable'; | |
function previous(length: number, current: number) { | |
return (current - 1 + length) % length; | |
} | |
function next(length: number, current: number) { | |
return (current + 1) % length; | |
} |
This script will download and replace ~/Applications/VSCode-linux-x64
with the latest VS Code Insiders.
jq
: https://stedolan.github.io/jq/download/update-code
somewhere in your PATH
// @flow | |
import React from 'react'; | |
import { Container, Subscribe } from 'unstated'; | |
function formatPrice(price: number) { | |
return `$${Math.round(price * 100) / 100} USD`; | |
} | |
class CartItem { | |
constructor(name: string, price: number) { |
If you're on your phone, please request the 🖥 desktop site to star this gist 😇
I would talk about some myths on Jest & Enzyme. Moreover to stop the comparison of Jest and Enzyme. Instead would focus on how they can work together to test well your React Components. The talk would focus on "How Jest and Enzyme complement each other" and can help you test React components in a better way.
This proposal is not longer active. Context: https://twitter.com/siddharthkp/status/909818777314902016
import React, { Component } from 'react' | |
import { BrowserRouter as Router, Route, Link, Match, Redirect, Switch } from 'react-router-dom' | |
import OverviewPage from './page/OverviewPage' | |
import AccountPage from './page/AccountPage' | |
/* | |
Layouts, inline define here for demo purpose | |
you may want to define in another file instead | |
*/ |
[8:27 PM] cquill: @acemarke Right, so many portions of the UI will be connected. But does each connected portion typically get its own container component? Seems verbose and redundant to have the following for each CRUD resource: UserList, UserListContainer, UserView, UserViewContainer, UserEdit, UserEditContainer, UserNew, UserNewContainer. Is there a simpler way?
[9:56 PM] acemarke: @cquill : this leads into one of my favorite (?) semi-rants, and one that I apparently need to write down so I can paste it
[9:57 PM] acemarke: A "container" component is simply any component whose primary job is to fetch data from somewhere, and pass that data on to its children
[9:58 PM] acemarke: With Redux, the wrapper components generated by connect are "container" components, since their job is to extract data from the Redux store
[9:58 PM] acemarke: I generally dislike the somewhat-common approach of trying to divide everything into a "components" folder and a "containers" folder
[9:59 P
import SimpleHTTPServer | |
import SocketServer | |
class FakeRedirect(SimpleHTTPServer.SimpleHTTPRequestHandler): | |
def do_GET(self): | |
print self.path | |
self.send_response(301) | |
new_path = '%s%s'%('http://localhost:8081', self.path) | |
self.send_header('Location', new_path) | |
self.end_headers() |
/** | |
* Axios Request Wrapper | |
* --------------------- | |
* | |
* @author Sheharyar Naseer (@sheharyarn) | |
* @license MIT | |
* | |
*/ | |
import axios from 'axios' |
class Sortable extends React.Component { | |
componentDidMount() { | |
// Every React component has a function that exposes the | |
// underlying DOM node that it is wrapping. We can use that | |
// DOM node, pass it to jQuery and initialize the plugin. | |
// You'll find that many jQuery plugins follow this same pattern | |
// and you'll be able to pass the component DOM node to jQuery | |
// and call the plugin function. |