Whether it's because of websites like Twitter, with its limit on character counts, or whether it's something else, the use of short labels is astonishingly common online, in both tweets and headlines.
What do I mean by "short label"? Things like:
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- | |
| iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEgYtgnomHliYDCUth7GcgK+kJUkcFAlvuOnQACgkQ7GcgK+kJ | |
| UkfNJA/9HFQHYHeowOOkzF4YFCFStzRNsL+Wt5UI1TvoU+JiYyO2aZGBa47lCL4D | |
| 4I+Z2qfnqtFwWp8SFT7m83HdzDAIHV/DS/5imMP5J6bL4jY9dBk9jNs1XsDum5lh | |
| C7akyFCJxcksvGRxPvF6b3HuGB2yKj+hau3Mu7sah/vUAhj2370cKZbbeY4MQTil | |
| 1Qs5JGRSp4KGA/+1roTOgFgr7eSrkn+9uL+y4bw//j+H1vl10gSLXAIWaG6Tpceu | |
| AOsj2NtuyegECY52a+8u3ZEyrqo7gj6xP5XevcEqrZFiTlvT/nnaNqzRbWlhbNwe | |
| IUPRxoLRdmyw7eaO8yoGQLPysFpxKhnDbfHG4X1H6DpggUWdTPifBtvVOvYL90A7 | |
| zAsn2hPQG/s5MLpAI4hl+hBhoNrjCqmqYkOq/+TzXNQUo5mkefNL2FmQlTbAqj4X |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- | |
| iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEgYtgnomHliYDCUth7GcgK+kJUkcFAlvY+KoACgkQ7GcgK+kJ | |
| UkcZEw/7BW/70ZCh9fECRK/knRdMCPC4Po28L+FJvdx8kh7bT0OLg0ZDDtlRUWXi | |
| 6DIInP8I1Waat1hHrNDybKayvvGTlzIqFNCrPiU70wDT8frxyQLow2IoazJOtaQq | |
| 5f6yRTfJYuxMULVcHdgw1buesMKMSUI1afJH/J62pNm5ahjCt31oeFjCuWNnpEkz | |
| NnaQQAcokQUE1tDIFRprmP1WbmcEe7crJiOIo6D+6OzUZfNmHah5Y11gPiY3e1FL | |
| eNucHmPOIrc+8v5XKVpm5PllPH6oEMlpD0t4y2kS8TXqfSfE7v5sxs9YU2tp4USk | |
| UlIOvA4PcGDJq97Q51yTDaHodzbuPuiJxtO+VVueG8AEghOngN+CCNOjEFXb6RZ9 | |
| 3jGE2LyVZfJhreGJIzYXEJDqfuLWCTmymsl3rVAWJX7V606Rs6+vmbM5Cl6zFviZ |
There are different reasons for different people.
The 9/11 false flag fooled quite a large number of people. One could say it fooled several countries (thanks to centralized ownership of mass media).
Whenever James Corbett takes a position on something, I pay attention.
Why? Because James is one of the few journalists worth paying attention to.
However, like everyone, James has his blind spots and biases. For James, an avowed anarchist, it's government (the good parts).
Today James tweeted an interview on an anti-Net Neutrality article by Jeffrey A. Tucker, who had this to say:
The Activist wants to protect people, but in doing so acknowledges their methods also protect bad people.
The NSA wants to protect people, but in doing so acknowledges their methods also harm good people.
The following was sent to [bitcoin-dev] on October 9, 2017 under the subject "Generalized sharding protocol for decentralized scaling without Miners owning our BTC".
Dear list,
In previous arguments over Drivechain (and Drivechain-like proposals) I promised that better scaling proposals — that do not sacrifice Bitcoin's security — would come along.
Here's what it does:
It must work in Firefox 57+, and ideally it would work in other browsers as well (via WebExtensions). Released under some open source license.
If you like this idea and want to pitch in, feel free to post a comment below or tweet at me.
An increased use of anyone-can-spend (ACS) transactions in Bitcoin has potentially dangerous repercussions for its future.
DISCLAIMER: This is my current understanding, and as Drivechain evolves it might change.
Normal bitcoins cannot be stolen by anyone. You need the private key to spend them. Even a 51%+ coalition of miners cannot spend them (but they can censor them).
We can fix this, and it doesn't require us turning our back on the old system. In fact, it makes it much more difficult for new and improved systems to emerge if we don't work together with those who are trying to improve the old system.
Do you think Trump would be cool with liquid democracy or sovereign city-states? What about Hillary?
I think both would make it very difficult to make any radical improvements. By choosing either we are simultaneously limiting our options to move forward and experiment with new systems. In fact, we increase the likelihood that new systems will simply be outright banned.
So this election, if you agree, #VoteThirdParty.
