Last active
January 16, 2024 13:50
-
-
Save thebuilder/fb07c989093d4a82811625de361884e7 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Hook with ref callback
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
import React, {useCallback, useRef} from 'react' | |
function useHookWithRefCallback() { | |
const ref = useRef(null) | |
const setRef = useCallback(node => { | |
if (ref.current) { | |
// Make sure to cleanup any events/references added to the last instance | |
} | |
if (node) { | |
// Check if a node is actually passed. Otherwise node would be null. | |
// You can now do what you need to, addEventListeners, measure, etc. | |
} | |
// Save a reference to the node | |
ref.current = node | |
}, []) | |
return [setRef] | |
} | |
function Component() { | |
// In your component you'll still recieve a `ref`, but it | |
// will be a callback function instead of a Ref Object | |
const [ref] = useHookWithRefCallback() | |
return <div ref={ref}>Ref element</div> | |
} |
Setting .current
doesn't trigger a rerender, so things might not work like you expect.
function Component() {
// In your component you'll still recieve a `ref`, but it
// will be a callback function instead of a Ref Object
const [ref] = useHookWithRef()
ref.current = 'Not your div'
return <div ref={ref}>Ref element</div>
}
I'm wondering why you're returning [setRef]
instead of setRef
directly. Is there a specific reason for this?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Excellent gist!
@thebuilder, I'm trying to understand how this would happen. Are you able to describe this risk further with a quick example? Thank you.