Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@threepointone
Last active February 13, 2023 02:12
Show Gist options
  • Star 15 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save threepointone/43f16389fd96561a8b0b to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save threepointone/43f16389fd96561a8b0b to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
sto alternate api
// store.js
let {store, handler} = sto(initialState, reduceFn); // where reduceFn: function(currentState, action, ...args){}
dispatcher.register(handler);
export store;
// elsewhere
store.get() // -> current state
store.toObservable() // -> to be used with .observe()
// that's it.
@threepointone
Copy link
Author

What are the usecases for timetravel in stores? Debugging, surely, but what else? Undo/redo?

@gaearon
Copy link

gaearon commented May 6, 2015

But then stores would need a .setState() equivalent?

Why? If they don't own state and only tell how to compute it, maybe “dispatcher” has the power to give components some older state of all stores instead of the current state.

What are the usecases for timetravel in stores?

Debugging, for sure. Now that I'm thinking of it, I also want to support restore-from-JSON and serialize-to-JSON. Which doesn't usually work well with Flux —but— our Stores don't need to own the state. The may just specify calculation. If dispatcher holds state and uses stores to reduce it and “advance” it, it can hold it in a single tree internally and snapshot/restore/rollback to any point.

@threepointone
Copy link
Author

But that's the thing, they do own it. Specifically, they hide it. Like an observable; you can't set the 'current' value to operate on. To get around this you'll need a .setState(), at least exposed to the dispatcher.

Alternately, yes, the dispatcher/view controller could bypass all that and load cached state. But then you can't fire further actions until you get back to where you came from.

@threepointone
Copy link
Author

just read the part where dispatcher holds state. good idea, need to think it though..

@threepointone
Copy link
Author

export const store = dispatcher.register(initialState, reduceFn);

this changes the register signature, but should be easier to do the above now.

@gaearon
Copy link

gaearon commented May 6, 2015

Here's something I played with: https://gist.github.com/gaearon/c02f3eb38724b64ab812
Let me know your thoughts!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment