Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@trueadm
Last active October 1, 2018 22:47
Show Gist options
  • Save trueadm/35f083d32e5af93dd8fd706dae378123 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save trueadm/35f083d32e5af93dd8fd706dae378123 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
const React = require("react");
const Lifecycles = React.createLifecycleEvents({
didMount({ setState }) {
setState({
disabled: false,
});
},
didUpdate({ inputRef }) {
if (document.activeElement !== inputRef.value) {
inputRef.value.focus();
}
}
});
// pass in initial state
const State = React.createState({
disabled: true,
text: "",
});
function TextboxView(props) {
const inputRef = React.createRef();
return (
<State>
{(state, setState) => (
<Lifecycles inputRef={inputRef} setState={setState}>
<input
{...props}
ref={inputRef}
disabled={state.disabled}
onChange={e => setState({text: e.target.value})}
value={state.text}
/>
</Lifecycles>
)}
</State>
);
}
const React = require("react");
const Lifecycles = React.createLifecycleEvents({
componentDidMount({ setState }) {
setState({
disabled: false,
});
},
componentDidUpdate({ inputRef }) {
if (document.activeElement !== inputRef.value) {
inputRef.value.focus();
}
}
});
const State = React.createState({
disabled: true,
text: "",
});
function ListView() {
const inputRef = React.createRef();
// "adopt" could be sugar syntax for React's callReturn functionality
const { state, setState } = adopt <State />;
return (
<Lifecycles inputRef={inputRef} setState={setState}>
<input
ref={inputRef}
disabled={state.disabled}
onChange={e => setState({text: e.target.value})}
value={state.text}
/>
</Lifecycles>
)
}
@streamich
Copy link

What would adopt <State /> compile to?

@TrySound
Copy link

TrySound commented Mar 4, 2018

@streamich It's like await expansion. Every adopt statement creates new function scope.

function ListView() {
  const inputRef = React.createRef();
  return (
    <State>
      {({ state, setState }) => (
        <Lifecycles inputRef={inputRef} setState={setState}>
          <input 
            ref={inputRef} 
            disabled={state.disabled}
            onChange={e => setState({text: e.target.value})} 
            value={state.text}
          />
        </Lifecycles>
      )}
    </State>
  );
}

@TrySound
Copy link

TrySound commented Mar 4, 2018

@lmatteis Not quite. It's what react-powerplug tries to do.

@trueadm
Copy link
Author

trueadm commented Mar 4, 2018

@TrySound

  1. Tricky one. One approach might be for the update check to compare the value of a ref object, but that would be a special case. Another might be to put thee ref in the state.

  2. You would store ResizeObserver in state, just as you would with other "instance variables".

  3. getDerivedStateFromProps and shouldComponentUpdate could be done like:

const State = React.createState({ lastProps: null });

function MyComponent(props) {
  const shouldUpdate = ({lastProps}) => shallowCheck(lastProps, props);
  const deriveState = () => ({lastProps: props});
  const { state, setState } = adopt <State shouldUpdate={shouldUpdate} deriveState={deriveState} />;
  // ... rest of code
}

@OlegLustenko
Copy link

OlegLustenko commented Mar 5, 2018

Look like code similar to reason-react ideas

@drcmda
Copy link

drcmda commented Sep 9, 2018

I implemented a very basic POC for #2, using Reacts error bounds: https://codesandbox.io/embed/rr1838zvqm I'm guessing this will also more or less be the way in which suspense can read out fetchers (?), like Dan showed us in his talk.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment