# source : http://code.google.com/p/natvpn/source/browse/trunk/stun_server_list | |
# A list of available STUN server. | |
stun.l.google.com:19302 | |
stun1.l.google.com:19302 | |
stun2.l.google.com:19302 | |
stun3.l.google.com:19302 | |
stun4.l.google.com:19302 | |
stun01.sipphone.com | |
stun.ekiga.net | |
stun.fwdnet.net | |
stun.ideasip.com | |
stun.iptel.org | |
stun.rixtelecom.se | |
stun.schlund.de | |
stunserver.org | |
stun.softjoys.com | |
stun.voiparound.com | |
stun.voipbuster.com | |
stun.voipstunt.com | |
stun.voxgratia.org | |
stun.xten.com |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Thanks, guys! Just want to add STUN Servers Located in Japan.
Ref. Source: http://wiki.tomocha.net/SIP_STUNserver.html Actually, I am thinking about hosting STUN on one of my servers. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
There is also
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
There is also stun.services.mozilla.com |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hello! List of 267 public STUN servers from EmerCoin project:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
URL has changed for EmerCoin stun list: http://olegh.ftp.sh/public-stun.txt |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Also, stun.sipgate.net is currently working |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Can I use this STUN servers free of cost? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
ആശനെ ചൂമ്മാ കിട്ടും ആയിരിക്കും ഇല്ലേ ... |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
hi, is there any stun server in China |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Public STUN server we do provide since 2 yrs: stun.jappix.com:3478 (UDP + TCP) |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
stun*.l.google.com use other port now
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Is there any stun server from Germany/Austria ? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Interesting that the only one with IPv6 support is numb.viagenie.ca..., not even google's servers |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
With IPv6, NAT has been all but eradicated... eliminating the need for all these NAT-workaround technologies :) |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@dineshvg |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
stun.bcs2005.net |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
is there any server that support tcp ? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Any recommendations for a reliable, commercial service? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
QuckBlox try it. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Didn't work any |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hey hey! Have a node STUN implementation at Varstate.com - still needs some testing but please feel free to use. URL information is available there. If you have any problems please feel free to reach out to me at the listed contact points! Cheers! |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Per the above: https://github.com/Thoughtscript/tool-node_stun - take a peek :) |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@Thoughscript is there is a stun server written in vanilla javascript? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This is stunning! |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Until it took a TURN |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@Globik sorry for the delay!! Yep the stun server is pure vanilla ES6 javascript in Node |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Any STUN servers in India |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Someone could report stun ip: stun.l.google.com: 19302 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@aofall stun*.l.google.com still use 19302 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Google's recommendations for Hangouts traffic : https://support.google.com/a/answer/1279090?hl=en#latency |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Does any one have any idea what to do if google stun is not available ?! Can we refer to any support or something ! |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
also, |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Any public STUN servers in the middle east? Oman, UAE?? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
{ |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
അളിയാ കിട്ടിയോ? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Any public STUN servers in Australia? All of them are over 100-200ms away! |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Any public STUN server in North of Africa. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Any public STUN server in Canada. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I wonder how I can test my own server. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Any Public STUN Server in South America? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
How does stun.l.google.com cough up IPs? I see only one IP at a time when doing a DNS A record lookup. How do we know the full list of IP addresses behind this DNS A record? This IP is not returning a Binding Request: 74.125.192.127 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Google seems to be broadcasting this IP for stun (74.125.192.127) but it’s no good and does not properly handle STUN requests. It seems to be ISP dependent, meaning certain ISPs are caching that DNS resolution, but I’ve seen the number of Customers across multiple ISPs who are having STUN issues growing this week, and all affected users are resolving stun.l.google.com to the 74.xxx address. We have implemented a fallback to Freeswitch Stun in case response from Google STUN is not returned. Standard WebRTC protocol in browsers expect on or more STUN server paths and will resolve DNS for both, and will initiate the STUN request to both in parallel for any applicable candidates. This has resolved the issue for us, but would be great if Google can stop broadcasting that IP. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Google apparently provides a pool, but you'll need to reference each individually: stun.l.google.com has address 74.125.192.127 Note: I can successfully ping them all right now. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hi bud, how you test these server address? Just paste them in the web browser address?@sburlappp |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
You can test a STUN server using the tools on this webpage: https://webrtc.github.io/samples/src/content/peerconnection/trickle-ice/ |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Ok so I don't understand - what are the benefits of using a STUN server vs connecting P2P? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
in P2P no necessary use STUN Server, but behind Firewall this connection is stable with this type server, for me STUN Server works is great solution for virtualization behind Firewall Perimetral |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
is this list still available yet?? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
yes |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
machanee |
This comment has been minimized.
Thanks heaps for this :)
I actually ended up using this list as the source list for a node module (browserify friendly):
https://github.com/DamonOehlman/freeice
From my testing though (I make sure each of the servers is currently responding within 5s) as part of the module unit tests, I ended up removing the following as they either were no longer found in DNS or were just too slow to respond: