| Common misconceptions about Progressive Web Apps | |
| They have to be SPAs. | |
| They have to live at pwa.*.com | |
| They have to be mobile only. | |
| They're not allowed to be responsive. | |
| They have to use material design. | |
| They only work in chrome. | |
| They don't work in safari or on iOS. | |
| They have to look like your android app. |
dandv
commented
Aug 23, 2016
•
|
They can't run in full-screen (source). Also, Gist comments don't trigger notifications, so it might be better to host this list somewhere else. |
dalmaer
commented
Aug 23, 2016
|
You must use push notifications |
jmadler
commented
Aug 23, 2016
|
They require a rewrite of your web app |
dalmaer
commented
Aug 23, 2016
|
You must use pull quotes |
dalmaer
commented
Aug 23, 2016
|
You must be named "Paul" |
addyosmani
commented
Aug 23, 2016
|
They're difficult to monetize |
senthilp
commented
Aug 23, 2016
|
It is difficult to deploy a critical bug fix and have it immediately available to all my PWA users |
stuartlangridge
commented
Aug 23, 2016
|
It's easy to describe these facilities to your users. |
dalmaer
commented
Aug 23, 2016
|
Offline is building for Wendy on a plane and isn't worth the effort |
tomayac
commented
Aug 23, 2016
|
They can be installed and discovered via some sort of app store or PWA market… Blame the 'A' in the PWA acronym. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
They can't be progressively enhanced
They can't be built with framework X
They can't be as smooth as native apps
They can't work on desktop
They require a high technical barrier to build