Frankie Bagnardi aka GreenJello has passed away on Sept 13, 2021 at age 27
Many of you in this channel know of him because he spent much of his time helping others, his death is a great blow to the community
He lost his battle with depression
Rest In Peace Frankie, we will never forget you.
If you are in a dark place, please reach out to chanops or the ones closest to you
| /** | |
| * !!!! This code doesn't work anymore !!!! | |
| * | |
| * - You can check working code on comments. I won't update this code anymore. | |
| * | |
| * Also, I just decided to remove this code. You can check revisions for old code. | |
| * Since this code was made for discord client that almost 5 years ago, It seems like doesn't work anymore. | |
| * I don't want people keep arguing in the comments, i decided to remove this code. | |
| * | |
| * Note: This code is now fulfilled with Javascript comments. This code won't work even if you pasted to console. doesn't do anything. |
https://gist.github.com/ljharb/58faf1cfcb4e6808f74aae4ef7944cff
While attempting to explain JavaScript's reduce method on arrays, conceptually, I came up with the following - hopefully it's helpful; happy to tweak it if anyone has suggestions.
JavaScript Arrays have lots of built in methods on their prototype. Some of them mutate - ie, they change the underlying array in-place. Luckily, most of them do not - they instead return an entirely distinct array. Since arrays are conceptually a contiguous list of items, it helps code clarity and maintainability a lot to be able to operate on them in a "functional" way. (I'll also insist on referring to an array as a "list" - although in some languages, List is a native data type, in JS and this post, I'm referring to the concept. Everywhere I use the word "list" you can assume I'm talking about a JS Array) This means, to perform a single operation on the list as a whole ("atomically"), and to return a new list - thus making it mu
