... or Why Pipelining Is Not That Easy
Golang Concurrency Patterns for brave and smart.
By @kachayev
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; Ant sim ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; | |
; Copyright (c) Rich Hickey. All rights reserved. | |
; The use and distribution terms for this software are covered by the | |
; Common Public License 1.0 (http://opensource.org/licenses/cpl.php) | |
; which can be found in the file CPL.TXT at the root of this distribution. | |
; By using this software in any fashion, you are agreeing to be bound by | |
; the terms of this license. | |
; You must not remove this notice, or any other, from this software. | |
;dimensions of square world |
... or Why Pipelining Is Not That Easy
Golang Concurrency Patterns for brave and smart.
By @kachayev
Kris Nuttycombe asks:
I genuinely wish I understood the appeal of unityped languages better. Can someone who really knows both well-typed and unityped explain?
I think the terms well-typed and unityped are a bit of question-begging here (you might as well say good-typed versus bad-typed), so instead I will say statically-typed and dynamically-typed.
I'm going to approach this article using Scala to stand-in for static typing and Python for dynamic typing. I feel like I am credibly proficient both languages: I don't currently write a lot of Python, but I still have affection for the language, and have probably written hundreds of thousands of lines of Python code over the years.
;; based on core.logic 0.8-alpha2 or core.logic master branch | |
(ns sudoku | |
(:refer-clojure :exclude [==]) | |
(:use clojure.core.logic)) | |
(defn get-square [rows x y] | |
(for [x (range x (+ x 3)) | |
y (range y (+ y 3))] | |
(get-in rows [x y]))) |
# ~/.tmux.conf | |
# | |
# See the following files: | |
# | |
# /opt/local/share/doc/tmux/t-williams.conf | |
# /opt/local/share/doc/tmux/screen-keys.conf | |
# /opt/local/share/doc/tmux/vim-keys.conf | |
# | |
# URLs to read: | |
# |
Rich Hickey • 3 years ago
Sorry, I have to disagree with the entire premise here.
A wide variety of experiences might lead to well-roundedness, but not to greatness, nor even goodness. By constantly switching from one thing to another you are always reaching above your comfort zone, yes, but doing so by resetting your skill and knowledge level to zero.
Mastery comes from a combination of at least several of the following:
This blog post series has moved here.
You might also be interested in the 2016 version.
gifify() { | |
if [[ -n "$1" ]]; then | |
if [[ $2 == '--good' ]]; then | |
ffmpeg -i $1 -r 10 -vcodec png out-static-%05d.png | |
time convert -verbose +dither -layers Optimize -resize 600x600\> out-static*.png GIF:- | gifsicle --colors 128 --delay=5 --loop --optimize=3 --multifile - > $1.gif | |
rm out-static*.png | |
else | |
ffmpeg -i $1 -s 600x400 -pix_fmt rgb24 -r 10 -f gif - | gifsicle --optimize=3 --delay=3 > $1.gif | |
fi | |
else |
#!/usr/bin/perl | |
# Emacs starter for Emacs mac port | |
# Thanks to Aquamacs Project and David Reitter | |
my $args = ""; | |
my $tmpfiles = ""; | |
for my $f (@ARGV) { |