Most AI coding CLIs today let you pick a model per role (coder, planner, reviewer). But what if tool access were tied to model capability instead?
Idea: The same logical agent loop uses different models for different tool types, based on what each model is actually good at — not just what role it plays.
This sits between two existing concepts:
| <!DOCTYPE html> | |
| <html lang="en"> | |
| <head> | |
| <meta charset="utf-8"/> | |
| <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"/> | |
| <title>LLA Action Item Digest — 2026-08-02 23:03 UTC</title> | |
| <style> | |
| :root { | |
| --bg:#0f1419; --panel:#1a222c; --ink:#e8eef5; --muted:#9aabbd; | |
| --accent:#3dd6c6; --fresh:#7ddea4; --older:#f0b35a; --line:#2b3642; |
| <!DOCTYPE html> | |
| <html lang="en"> | |
| <head> | |
| <meta charset="UTF-8"> | |
| <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"> | |
| <meta name="referrer" content="no-referrer"> | |
| <title>Transcript - 「🟢」mgmt-chicagow</title> | |
| <link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Outfit:wght@300;400;500;600;700&display=swap" rel="stylesheet"> | |
| <style> | |
| :root { |
Run time: 2026-08-02T23:02:59.533525+00:00 Ideas cleared 15/25: 30
Score: 20/25 · Type: Government Leakage Detection · Window: immediate · Effort: Medium
| { | |
| "Classes": [ | |
| { | |
| "Members": [ | |
| { | |
| "Category": "Data", | |
| "MemberType": "Property", | |
| "Name": "ClassName", | |
| "Security": { |
用途：标准用户账户、不知道管理员密码、不改密码的前提下临时获取管理员权限，用完恢复标准用户，不留安全隐患。 核心原则：不改密码；提权与恢复都可逆，用完即还原。 前提：设备归你自己所有。学校/公司管控设备不适用，联系管理员处理。
| id | station | stationid | value | unit | obstime | date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 流浮山 | RF001 | 3 | mm | 2026-08-03T06:45:00+08:00 | 2026-08-03 | |
| 1 | 湿地公园 | RF002 | 6 | mm | 2026-08-03T06:45:00+08:00 | 2026-08-03 | |
| 2 | 水边围 | N12 | 8 | mm | 2026-08-03T06:45:00+08:00 | 2026-08-03 | |
| 3 | 石岗 | RF003 | M | mm | 2026-08-03T06:45:00+08:00 | 2026-08-03 | |
| 4 | 大美督 | RF004 | 0 | mm | 2026-08-03T06:45:00+08:00 | 2026-08-03 | |
| 5 | 大埔墟 | RF005 | 1 | mm | 2026-08-03T06:45:00+08:00 | 2026-08-03 | |
| 6 | 北潭涌 | RF006 | 2 | mm | 2026-08-03T06:45:00+08:00 | 2026-08-03 | |
| 7 | 滘西洲 | RF007 | 2 | mm | 2026-08-03T06:45:00+08:00 | 2026-08-03 | |
| 8 | 西贡 | N15 | 9 | mm | 2026-08-03T06:45:00+08:00 | 2026-08-03 |
This reproduces the Anvil Serving configuration that measured 141.6 output tokens/s median decode, 8,793 prompt tokens/s effective prefill, and a working 650,000-token context window on two RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q cards under Windows 11, Docker Desktop, and WSL2.
This is a single-user, exclusive TP=2 configuration. It consumes nearly all VRAM on both cards and is not intended for GPU workload co-residency.
A single stubborn question: what happens to EPA SWMM's dynamic wave solver when one connected conduit chain spans three orders of magnitude in length? This generator builds exactly that network, runs it in-browser, and lets you find out.
🌐 Live App: https://log-scaled-hilbert-swmm5-inp-file.netlify.app
Takes the traversal order of a Hilbert space-filling curve — not its geometry — and assigns each step a physical length equal to scale × [ln(k+2) − ln(k+1)], producing one continuous serial SWMM5 conduit chain (J0 → outfall) where conduit lengths shrink logarithmically along the path.
