updated 2021-06-23
Version 2105 (Build 16.0.14026.20302)
β Your Requirements:
| import requests | |
| cookies = dict(CMSESSION="YOUR SESSION TOKEN HERE") | |
| for x in range(150): | |
| incoming = requests.get('http://creativemarket.com/op/download/%s' % x, cookies=cookies) | |
| if 'content-disposition' not in incoming.headers: | |
| print "%s not a valid file" % x | |
| continue | |
| file_name = incoming.headers['content-disposition'].split("\"")[1] |
| <# | |
| .SYNOPSIS | |
| PowerShell replacement for the `code-insiders.cmd` launcher. | |
| .DESCRIPTION | |
| Sets the same environment variables used by the original batch launcher, resolves | |
| the `Code - Insiders.exe` and the CLI script (`resources\app\out\cli.js`) relative | |
| to this script's location (one level up), forwards all arguments, and exits with | |
| the executable's exit code. | |
A pattern for building personal knowledge bases using LLMs.
This is an idea file, it is designed to be copy pasted to your own LLM Agent (e.g. OpenAI Codex, Claude Code, OpenCode / Pi, or etc.). Its goal is to communicate the high level idea, but your agent will build out the specifics in collaboration with you.
Most people's experience with LLMs and documents looks like RAG: you upload a collection of files, the LLM retrieves relevant chunks at query time, and generates an answer. This works, but the LLM is rediscovering knowledge from scratch on every question. There's no accumulation. Ask a subtle question that requires synthesizing five documents, and the LLM has to find and piece together the relevant fragments every time. Nothing is built up. NotebookLM, ChatGPT file uploads, and most RAG systems work this way.
| Round | Human Score | AI Score |
|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | 1% | 99% |
| Round 2 | 18% | 82% |
| Round 3 | 60% | 40% |
| Round 4 | 99% | 1% |