Picking the right architecture = Picking the right battles + Managing trade-offs
A pattern for building personal knowledge bases using LLMs.
This is an idea file, it is designed to be copy pasted to your own LLM Agent (e.g. OpenAI Codex, Claude Code, OpenCode / Pi, or etc.). Its goal is to communicate the high level idea, but your agent will build out the specifics in collaboration with you.
Most people's experience with LLMs and documents looks like RAG: you upload a collection of files, the LLM retrieves relevant chunks at query time, and generates an answer. This works, but the LLM is rediscovering knowledge from scratch on every question. There's no accumulation. Ask a subtle question that requires synthesizing five documents, and the LLM has to find and piece together the relevant fragments every time. Nothing is built up. NotebookLM, ChatGPT file uploads, and most RAG systems work this way.
| # AFF | |
| # 如果你想支持我，可以通过我的邀请链接购买机场 | |
| # 感谢支持 | |
| # 1. ssLinks 邀请码: fSo2OhzH https://98a6251b6cd7471da86cca993b6dbe6f.36d.biz/#/register?code=fSo2OhzH | |
| # 2. 一元机场 邀请码: r3f1duds https://xn--4gq62f52gdss.top/#/register?code=r3f1duds | |
| # 一定要填我的邀请码，不填我哭给你看😭 | |
| # mihomo (Clash Meta) 懒人配置 | |
| # 版本 V1.24-260705 |
| export const timeSince = ( date: string ) => { | |
| const baseDate = new Date(date) | |
| const seconds = Math.floor(( new Date().getTime() - baseDate.getTime() ) / 1000); | |
| let interval = seconds / 31536000; |
Caution
As of April 7th 2026, Discord has expressed their intent to crack down on automating quest completion.
Some users have received the following system message:
There isn't much I can do to make the script undetected, so use it at your own risk, as you most likely WILL get flagged by doing so.
Starting with Samba 4.20, administrators have reported that using include = /etc/samba/smb.conf.%I does not reliably apply settings like server min protocol = NT1. The reason is that protocol negotiation happens at the very start of the connection, before the include file is loaded. As a result, even if you specify NT1 in the per-IP include file, the server has already locked onto the global default (SMB2_02 or higher), and the client will fail with “No protocol supported”.
This article explains why this happens and how to fix it using config file = %I.
Authors: @h0j3n, @aniqfakhrul
Date: July 24, 2026
Certighost is an Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS) vulnerability that allowed a low-privileged domain user to impersonate a Domain Controller and achieve domain compromise in the tested AD CS configuration. The issue was addressed in the July 2026 security updates.
The vulnerable path is an AD CS enrollment fallback known as a chase during directory-object resolution. By supplying request attributes such as cdc, an attacker could cause the Certification Authority (CA) to ask an attacker-controlled host for identity data belonging to a Domain Controller. The CA then used that data while issuing a certificate.
| // orig: https://gist.github.com/miketromba/334282421c4784d7d9a191ca25095c09 | |
| // Paste the script into your console on this page: https://myactivity.google.com/product/youtube | |
| const ENABLED = true; | |
| const MIN_DURATION_MS = 1000 * 60 * 1.5; // 1:30 mins | |
| const CHECK_FOR_CONFIRM_INTERVAL = 2000; | |
| let CYCLE_INTERVAL = 1800; // Amount of time in MS to wait between deletion (more likely to fail with a small number) | |
| let wantCycling = true; | |
| const VERY_LONG_DURATION = MIN_DURATION_MS * 10; |