Create a gist now

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@joepie91 /
Last active Apr 19, 2017

What would you like to do?
Don't use VPN services.

Don't use VPN services.

No, seriously, don't. You're probably reading this because you've asked what VPN service to use, and this is the answer.

Note: The content in this post does not apply to using VPN for their intended purpose; that is, as a virtual private (internal) network. It only applies to using it as a glorified proxy, which is what every third-party "VPN provider" does.

Why not?

Because a VPN in this sense is just a glorified proxy. The VPN provider can see all your traffic, and do with it what they want - including logging.

But my provider doesn't log!

There is no way for you to verify that, and of course this is what a malicious VPN provider would claim as well. In short: the only safe assumption is that every VPN provider logs.

And remember that it is in a VPN provider's best interest to log their users - it lets them deflect blame to the customer, if they ever were to get into legal trouble. The $10/month that you're paying for your VPN service doesn't even pay for the lawyer's coffee, so expect them to hand you over.

But a provider would lose business if they did that!

I'll believe that when HideMyAss goes out of business. They gave up their users years ago, and this was widely publicized. The reality is that most of their customers will either not care or not even be aware of it.

But I pay anonymously, using Bitcoin/PaysafeCard/Cash/drugs!

Doesn't matter. You're still connecting to their service from your own IP, and they can log that.

But I want more security!

VPNs don't provide security. They are just a glorified proxy.

But I want more privacy!

VPNs don't provide privacy, with a few exceptions (detailed below). They are just a proxy. If somebody wants to tap your connection, they can still do so - they just have to do so at a different point (ie. when your traffic leaves the VPN server).

But I want more encryption!

Use SSL/TLS and HTTPS (for centralized services), or end-to-end encryption (for social or P2P applications). VPNs can't magically encrypt your traffic - it's simply not technically possible. If the endpoint expects plaintext, there is nothing you can do about that.

When using a VPN, the only encrypted part of the connection is from you to the VPN provider. From the VPN provider onwards, it is the same as it would have been without a VPN. And remember, the VPN provider can see and mess with all your traffic.

But I want to confuse trackers by sharing an IP address!

Your IP address is a largely irrelevant metric in modern tracking systems. Marketers have gotten wise to these kind of tactics, and combined with increased adoption of CGNAT and an ever-increasing amount of devices per household, it just isn't a reliable data point anymore.

Marketers will almost always use some kind of other metric to identify and distinguish you. That can be anything from a useragent to a fingerprinting profile. A VPN cannot prevent this.

So when should I use a VPN?

There are roughly two usecases where you might want to use a VPN:

  1. You are on a known-hostile network (eg. a public airport WiFi access point, or an ISP that is known to use MITM), and you want to work around that.
  2. You want to hide your IP from a very specific set of non-government-sanctioned adversaries - for example, circumventing a ban in a chatroom or preventing anti-piracy scareletters.

In the second case, you'd probably just want a regular proxy specifically for that traffic - sending all of your traffic over a VPN provider (like is the default with almost every VPN client) will still result in the provider being able to snoop on and mess with your traffic.

However, in practice, just don't use a VPN provider at all, even for these cases.

So, then... what?

If you absolutely need a VPN, and you understand what its limitations are, purchase a VPS and set up your own. I will not recommend any specific providers (diversity is good!), but there are plenty of cheap ones to be found on LowEndBox.

But how is that any better than a VPN service?

A VPN provider specifically seeks out those who are looking for privacy, and who may thus have interesting traffic. Statistically speaking, it is more likely that a VPN provider will be malicious or a honeypot, than that an arbitrary generic VPS provider will be.

So why do VPN services exist? Surely they must serve some purpose?

Because it's easy money. You just set up OpenVPN on a few servers, and essentially start reselling bandwidth with a markup. You can make every promise in the world, because nobody can verify them. You don't even have to know what you're doing, because again, nobody can verify what you say. It is 100% snake-oil.

So yes, VPN services do serve a purpose - it's just one that benefits the provider, not you.


The post is fine but the headline is wrong. Especially since you clearly state valid use-cases for a VPN. So, yes, there are reasons to use a VPN. (Another use-case, probably covered in 2) is access to country-restricted services like netflix, bbc, etc). You just should never rely on a VPN to guarantee your anonymity.

nv-vn commented Dec 1, 2015

You just should never rely on a VPN to guarantee your anonymity

same goes for Tor or any other privacy service. you should always take as many measures as possible to prevent yourself from being tracked if you want to guarantee anonymity.

joepie91 commented Dec 1, 2015

@DynamicShitposter420 You're welcome to contribute to the discussion in a constructive manner (whether agreeing or not), but if all you're going to do is attacking me and trolling, then you can go elsewhere.

The post is fine but the headline is wrong. Especially since you clearly state valid use-cases for a VPN.

Yes, and this is intentional. My experience is that, whenever any claim is made of a VPN being even remotely usable for some usecases, people immediately assume that that includes theirs. This way, people need to read and understand the actual content of the article (and its described limitations and valid usecases) before drawing a conclusion.

Additionally, the concerns for "VPN services" remain applicable. You should still self-host your VPN.


I disagree, if the use-case is avoiding DMCA letters and alike. It's way too complicated to set it up in a way so it is not tied to your name. The vast majority of torrenters lack the ability to set up a VPS (let alone make sure it's anonymous) and run VPN servers securely. A VPN provider is the better solution.

joepie91 commented Dec 2, 2015

If you are not capable of obtaining a VPS anonymously, you are also not capable of obtaining a VPN anonymously, so this does not make a difference. It also still does not address the privacy concerns. If you just want to torrent and use a different service as a pincushion, then what you want is a proxy, not a VPN.


How does it matter that you're not able to obtain a VPN anonymously (we are talking about IP-address I suppose)? Your point in the original is that you're never anonymous to the VPN (which is why you shouldn't trust them). However, they don't pass on data to DMCA litigation companies (unless we are talking about HMA and alike who clearly state in their ToS that they log & pass on data).

As for proxies, how are they more secure? Also, please tell me where I get a 1Gbit proxy with unlimited traffic and ideally port forwarding, I'd definitely be using that.


Ok, but if you use TOR and VPN?

johwest commented Jan 11, 2016

A better solution is pay voor use from usenet and torrents ,so that your no longer afraid for trouble.
Now cost VPN money.


How does using your own VPS help? It's still easy for someone to trace the IP to your VPS and then to you.


I think the take-away here is not not fool yourself into thinking that VPN is some sort of short-cut for Tor. In other words, don't fool yourself into thinking you're anonymous, and for the love of everything good and holy, don't think that your VPN will go to jail for your activities.

However, I use VPN services all the time (for example, There are times when either:

  • I am behind a restrictive firewall, such as at a public library or a church.
  • I need to get into an internal network with other clients, such as my browser.

And I don't buy the argument that your IP address is not a valuable asset to trackers and ad companies. Some website owners block Tor, because they cannot get honest GeoIP lookups out of a client when the request comes out af a Tor exit relay. In fact, the whole point of Tor is to obfuscate your source IP address, while remaining encrypted between the Tor client and the relays.

However, as mentioned, don't have any false ideas about your security or anonymity when using VPN services. Understand the tech and your risks using the tech. That applies for anything, not just VPN and Tor.

1n1r2 commented Jul 16, 2016

VPN services have been bothering me since forever. This is the first article I have found to address my concerns.

Yes: VPN builds a secure tunnel
No: It does not protect my private communication
It's a giant keylogger on the net that I have given permission to steal my keystrokes.

It merely funnels the secure keystrokes through a proxy that can log them.

I think I'm safer logging in directly to secure connections ( https: ) to a specific site.

Talk me down, please. Why should I trust any single portal ( even if they do have multiple
connection sites ) to monitor my internet traffic ? Oh sure, it might be preferable in an
insecure environment like an airport terminal or coffee shop.

I trusted my employer's VPN while I was working, but I'm retired now.

Still looking for more articles or discussion to address my paranoia.


This makes absolutely no sense.

Do not use HideMyAss, Expat Shield, Hotspot Shield because they datamine/keep logs.

Do not use ProXPN, at 300kbp for free, you are going to limit your speeds to around 31KBs/s. Not only that but they do not use a open source client and the level of security is not confirmed to be completely secure.

VPNReactor is confirmed to have logs, but you are welcome to use it. They have a 30 minute time limit, then you have to wait another 30 minutes.

Do not use TOR or Ultrasurf, Although some software take advantage of it, these tools are meant for threatened bloggers, anonymous free speech and whistleblowing, not so you can download the latest Justin Bieber album.

Personally, I prefer to run my own VPN for $10/$15 a year using a cheap 128MB VPS from either Prometeus [the best] or Ramnode. You can also use it for other such as running a very small seedbox or web seed, or a tiny bittorrent tracker. The problem with this is that if you use legitimate details, the VPN could be traced back to you, but that's the same with VPNs that use a dedicated IP address who will cut you off, but using a shared IP address could mean a couple of software conflicts.


I wish more input would comes in on that nice thread..
I totally agree with
But then again, VPS provider such as DO or Linode does have your IP address and Logs. which is enought for any warrant to fuck you up.

Rich700000000000 commented Sep 20, 2016 edited

You're still connecting to their service from your own IP, and they can log that.

two paragraphs later:

Your IP address is a largely irrelevant metric in modern tracking systems.


If you absolutely need a VPN, and you understand what its limitations are, purchase a VPS and set up your own. I will not recommend any specific providers (diversity is good!), but there are plenty of cheap ones to be found on LowEndBox.

Statistically speaking, it is more likely that a VPN provider will be malicious or a honeypot, than that an arbitrary generic VPS provider will be.

  1. So let me get this straight: VPNs aren't anonymous, so I should give my credit card to Digitalocean instead?
  2. Statistically speaking, it is more likely that a VPS provider will give you up if a cop so much as glances in their direction, where as a reputable VPN company will at least attempt to push back.
  3. Most all VPS providers are anti-p2p, which is what most people use a vpn for.
  4. Go on, find me a VPS with unlimited bandwidth, forever. I'll be waiting.

I think your main problem is that you're mixing up threat models. If I wanted total anonymity, I'd have a laptop with the usb ports hot-glued shut in an anti-EMP bag under my bed, running Tails off of a flash drive, only connect to wifi stolen from the neighbors with a yagi antenna two meters across, use tor AND run my own tor relay so that they couldn't determine the origin of the traffic.

But I don't want to do that. I want to read FanFiction without being judged by the sysadmins at Comcast. Which is why I have a VPN.

Also, you are NOT going to stand there and tell me that EVERY VPN SERVICE IN EXISTACE is a honeypot. That's not a safe assumption, that's stallman-meets-alexjones paranoid. Do you know how much that would cost? How complex that would be?
There have been court cases:

And all they could do was shrug their shoulders.

Also, ever heard of a Warrant Canary?

TLDR: FUD 0/10, FUD with rice 0.01/10

Con7e commented Nov 30, 2016

I agree with @Rich700000000000 .

The question here is: who can you trust more, your ISP or your VPN provider? Your ISP must not be trusted by default (especially now in the UK), hence a decent VPN provider is your best bet, the "lesser of the two evils".

gwigz commented Dec 1, 2016

What about plausible deniability, with a shared IP?

jameshadley commented Dec 30, 2016 edited

I'm glad you're shining a light on public ignorance around VPN/proxy services but I don't agree that VPN services are useless. Most large/popular sites now use/require TLS and it is often the case that the visitor would prefer that the VPN provider were able to see the packet headers than their own ISP.

Why? Your own ISP have a lot of other information about you and, especially in the UK, are relied upon to supply the Government with personal information. It is less likely that a VPN provider would immediately divulge metadata to a government to which it does not answer - and it has less personal information about its customers than the residential/commercial ISP.

Sure, setting up your own is better in some ways. In others, it's not. For example, a commercial VPN will share IPs so it's harder to correlate packets leaving your home/office connection with packets arriving somewhere else. That said, for most people, the overwhelming feeling is expedience. When you have a full time job, a family and so on, a commercial VPN means one less thing to worry about.

Actually, I would not be surprised if several of the large, well-known, well-funded US-based VPN services are honeypots. But of course, there is plenty of choice and a bit of research can go a long way.


Never had a vpn and I've been sharing files for a long time, never had a summons from the MPAA or any other agency, never set foot in a court. Logically these snoop agencies can't monitor everyone's activity, it would cost a fortune. The cases where people have been taken to court for file sharing are few and far between in the UK where I live, I feel many of these VPN services are sold on a fear factor. UK ISP's will surrender your personal details if threatend with a court summons, proving that you were the person responsible for sharing the file is the difficult part.

tsjnachos117 commented Jan 5, 2017 edited

I do agree with many of the points made in this article. However, I'm not so sure it's a good idea to reject VPN services altogether. Rather, it seems to me like a better solution is to use VPN services with caution.

There are advantages to using a VPN over a proxy. For one thing, since VPN providers usually have their own websites, it's usually not too hard to find a privacy policy (although, as pointed out in the article, verifying that the provider is doing what said policy says is nearly-impossible). Whenever I search for a proxy, I'm usually greeted with a webpage, which in turn is just a list of IP addresses and ports (presumably from third party servers). Tracking down each address to find anything resembling a privacy policy is far too complicated for many users. On top of which, there might not be any such policy to find, so it's really had to know what's being logged, and what isn't.

Most VPN providers like to brag about the encryption they use. Although it can be hard to know for sure what encryption is actually being used (many providers like to say "advanced" or "military grade" without really specifying which encryption method is actually being used), that's still better than many proxies, which might not be using any encryption at all. (PS: avoid using old protocols like PPTP. PPTP is particularly bad, since it only supports a few encryption techniques, all of which have become outdated. I generally recommend OpenVPN.)

Also, since proxies don't route everything (only apps configured to use said proxies), there's no guarantee your browser's extensions (Java, Silverlight, Flash, etc.), which are often run in separate executable processes, will also be routed. If they are not routed, you can generally expect said extension to leak your IP address. On top of which, many browsers will leak the users' public IP address, even if you don't have any such addons installed. For example, Firefox is prone to WebRTC leaks, and DNS leaks. If you are using a VPN, Firefox will only leak your VPN provider's IP address, NOT your actual IP address (or, at least that's my experience on Ubuntu, when NetworkManager is set to create a virtual "tun" device).

Of course, hiding your IP address is only the first step in protecting your privacy. Hardening your browser is equally important. If you use a browser that supports a large number of addons (Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Chromium, etc), you'll find plenty of privacy-enhancing addons like Privacy Badger, NoScript, HTTPS Everywhere (or as I like to call it, "HTTPS wherever possible, including pages that offer HTTPS, but for some reason refuse to use it by default". Doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, does it?), uBlock Origin, DecentralEyes (Firefox only), and a boatload of others. Setting your user agent to whatever the most popular OS is (probably Windows 7 at the time of this writing) can help you blend into the crowd. It's also a good idea to get a canvas-blocking addons to prevent canvas fingerprinting. Last but not least, make sure to wipe your browsing info regularly. This is especially true for cookies, offline/HTML storage, and LSOs (aka "Flash Cookies"), as this information could easily be used to identify you.

As a final note, I'd like to mention the fact that all the privacy protection in the world won't mean a thing if you don't use said protection wisely. The TOR project, which aims to provide privacy through encrypted proxy-like relays (which, in turn, can be hosted by anyone who's willing to donate some of their bandwidth), has a very good list of DOs and DONTs, which can easily be applied to VPNs as well. Essentially, you compromise your privacy protections by identifying yourself (typically by clicking the "login" button) to a website, especially privacy-invading sites like Google and Facebook.


How about Open Source & Decentralized VPN? What do you think - would it help solve at least part of the problem?

arkbg1 commented Jan 25, 2017

Could you recommend any proxies? I'm asking for a friend.

Trauma7 commented Feb 15, 2017

He is absolutely correct! I am speaking from experience. From being betrayed by over a dozen of them. From the highest to lowest priced and recognizable free ones. If you are being stalked or tracked, an employee in an internet service provider ( any one they find you connecting to ) can and will betray you with the name of the VPN you are using. Then they move on to the VPN to betray you, with either two types of paper if you know what i mean. Do not listen to the lies! All VPN's have the ability, can and to monitor your connection to them.

Trauma7 commented Feb 15, 2017

The last should read; can and will monitor your connection to them. Even to the point of knowing the mac address of your device when you try to log on with a ISP unbeknownst to them.

k0nsl commented Mar 3, 2017

LOL, @nukeop.


Let's not forget to mention about how VPNs beg you so hard to pay them
It's very rare to find a free VPN
Every free VPN contains MB at the end all want you to pay money.
Seriously is there other way to stay secured?


I always thought the concept of a "VPN provider" was a bit of an oxymoron. I'd argue the most commonly intended implementation of a VPN is to bridge two private (trusted) networks over an insecure network, as opposed to knowingly letting some guy MITM all your traffic.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment