People
 :bowtie: |
😄 :smile: |
😆 :laughing: |
|---|---|---|
😊 :blush: |
😃 :smiley: |
:relaxed: |
😏 :smirk: |
😍 :heart_eyes: |
😘 :kissing_heart: |
😚 :kissing_closed_eyes: |
😳 :flushed: |
😌 :relieved: |
😆 :satisfied: |
😁 :grin: |
😉 :wink: |
😜 :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye: |
😝 :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes: |
😀 :grinning: |
😗 :kissing: |
😙 :kissing_smiling_eyes: |
😛 :stuck_out_tongue: |
FWIW: I (@rondy) am not the creator of the content shared here, which is an excerpt from Edmond Lau's book. I simply copied and pasted it from another location and saved it as a personal note, before it gained popularity on news.ycombinator.com. Unfortunately, I cannot recall the exact origin of the original source, nor was I able to find the author's name, so I am can't provide the appropriate credits.
RDBMS-based job queues have been criticized recently for being unable to handle heavy loads. And they deserve it, to some extent, because the queries used to safely lock a job have been pretty hairy. SELECT FOR UPDATE followed by an UPDATE works fine at first, but then you add more workers, and each is trying to SELECT FOR UPDATE the same row (and maybe throwing NOWAIT in there, then catching the errors and retrying), and things slow down.
On top of that, they have to actually update the row to mark it as locked, so the rest of your workers are sitting there waiting while one of them propagates its lock to disk (and the disks of however many servers you're replicating to). QueueClassic got some mileage out of the novel idea of randomly picking a row near the front of the queue to lock, but I can't still seem to get more than an an extra few hundred jobs per second out of it under heavy load.
So, many developers have started going straight t
Attention: the list was moved to
https://github.com/dypsilon/frontend-dev-bookmarks
This page is not maintained anymore, please update your bookmarks.
To setup your computer to work with *.test domains, e.g. project.test, awesome.test and so on, without having to add to your hosts file each time.
The following are examples of the four types rate limiters discussed in the accompanying blog post. In the examples below I've used pseudocode-like Ruby, so if you're unfamiliar with Ruby you should be able to easily translate this approach to other languages. Complete examples in Ruby are also provided later in this gist.
In most cases you'll want all these examples to be classes, but I've used simple functions here to keep the code samples brief.
This uses a basic token bucket algorithm and relies on the fact that Redis scripts execute atomically. No other operations can run between fetching the count and writing the new count.
| Mute these words in your settings here: https://twitter.com/settings/muted_keywords | |
| ActivityTweet | |
| generic_activity_highlights | |
| generic_activity_momentsbreaking | |
| RankedOrganicTweet | |
| suggest_activity | |
| suggest_activity_feed | |
| suggest_activity_highlights | |
| suggest_activity_tweet |
