piscisaureus

Locate the section for your github remote in the .git/config file. It looks like this:

[remote "origin"]
	fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
	url = git@github.com:joyent/node.git

Now add the line fetch = +refs/pull/*/head:refs/remotes/origin/pr/* to this section. Obviously, change the github url to match your project's URL. It ends up looking like this:

staltz

The introduction to Reactive Programming you've been missing

(by @andrestaltz)

---

This tutorial as a series of videos

If you prefer to watch video tutorials with live-coding, then check out this series I recorded with the same contents as in this article: Egghead.io - Introduction to Reactive Programming.

---

dergachev

OS X Screencast to animated GIF

This gist shows how to create a GIF screencast using only free OS X tools: QuickTime, ffmpeg, and gifsicle.

Instructions

To capture the video (filesize: 19MB), using the free "QuickTime Player" application:

fabiofl

sudo find /private/var/folders/ -name com.apple.dock.iconcache -exec rm {} \;

Rich-Harris

Please include a repro

You probably arrived here because of a curt message in response to an issue you filed on a repo that I contribute to. Sorry about that (particularly if you filed the issue long ago and have been waiting patiently for a response). Let me explain:

I work on a lot of different open source projects. I really do like building software that makes other people's lives easier, but it's crazy time-consuming. One of the most time-consuming parts is responding to issues. A lot of OSS maintainers will bend over backwards to try and understand your specific problem and diagnose it, to the point of setting up new test projects, fussing around with different Node versions, reading the documentation for build tools that we don't use, debugging problems in third party dependencies that appear to be involved in the problem... and so on. I've personally spent hundreds of hours of my free time doing these sorts of things to try and help people out, because I want to be a responsible maintainer and I

iAdramelk

Английская версия: https://evilmartians.com/chronicles/bootstrap-an-intervention

Вводная часть

У CSS есть несколько базовых проблем, которые позволяют очень быстро отстрелить себе ногу при неправильном использовании:

1. Глобальный неймспейс – в серверном программировании все что написано в файле, в файле и остается. Все же что написано в css и js засирает глобальное пространство имен со всеми вытекающими. В JS эту проблему сейчас побороли всякими модульными системами, а вот с css сложнее. В идеальном мире это должен починить Shadow DOM и настоящие Web Components, но пока их нет единственный способ с этим бороться – следовать какой-то системе именований селекторов, которая по возможности уменьшает и исключает возможные конфликты.

2. Каскадность – если на один элемент может сработать несколько правил, то они все и сработают последовательно. Если есть элемент h1.title, на него сработают все правила для тегов h1 и все правила для класса .title. Так как весь html состоит из тегов, то правил которые п

MrSwitch

// window.saveAs
// Shims the saveAs method, using saveBlob in IE10. 
// And for when Chrome and FireFox get round to implementing saveAs we have their vendor prefixes ready. 
// But otherwise this creates a object URL resource and opens it on an anchor tag which contains the "download" attribute (Chrome)
// ... or opens it in a new tab (FireFox)
// @author Andrew Dodson
// @copyright MIT, BSD. Free to clone, modify and distribute for commercial and personal use.

window.saveAs || ( window.saveAs = (window.navigator.msSaveBlob ? function(b,n){ return window.navigator.msSaveBlob(b,n); } : false) || window.webkitSaveAs || window.mozSaveAs || window.msSaveAs || (function(){

alekseykulikov

Recently CSS has got a lot of negativity. But I would like to defend it and show, that with good naming convention CSS works pretty well.

My 3 developers team has just developed React.js application with 7668 lines of CSS (and just 2 !important). During one year of development we had 0 issues with CSS. No refactoring typos, no style leaks, no performance problems, possibly, it is the most stable part of our application.

Here are main principles we use to write CSS for modern (IE11+) browsers:

• SUIT CSS naming conventions + SUIT CSS design principles;
• PostCSS + CSSNext. Future CSS syntax like variables, nesting, and autoprefixer are good enough;
• Flexbox is awesome. No need for grid framework;
• Normalize.css, base styles and variables are solid foundation for all components;

jlyonsmith

Common symbols

Modifiers

When a key combination is displayed, the modifiers are written in the order presented here. For example, Control + Option + Shift + Command + Q would be written as ⌃⌥⇧⌘Q.

Sym	Key	Alt
⌃	Control
⌥	Option

jbenet

a simple git branching model (written in 2013)

This is a very simple git workflow. It (and variants) is in use by many people. I settled on it after using it very effectively at Athena. GitHub does something similar; Zach Holman mentioned it in this talk.

Update: Woah, thanks for all the attention. Didn't expect this simple rant to get popular.