-
-
Save uogbuji/705383 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
#See: http://daringfireball.net/2010/07/improved_regex_for_matching_urls | |
import re, urllib | |
GRUBER_URLINTEXT_PAT = re.compile(ur'(?i)\b((?:https?://|www\d{0,3}[.]|[a-z0-9.\-]+[.][a-z]{2,4}/)(?:[^\s()<>]+|\(([^\s()<>]+|(\([^\s()<>]+\)))*\))+(?:\(([^\s()<>]+|(\([^\s()<>]+\)))*\)|[^\s`!()\[\]{};:\'".,<>?\xab\xbb\u201c\u201d\u2018\u2019]))') | |
for line in urllib.urlopen("http://daringfireball.net/misc/2010/07/url-matching-regex-test-data.text"): | |
print [ mgroups[0] for mgroups in GRUBER_URLINTEXT_PAT.findall(line) ] | |
@arunchaganty nice find! But the regex you posted as fix is exactly the same as the original as I see it. How did you mean to modify it?
can you provide the correct answer please?
I have the same problem , i used
GRUBER_URLINTEXT_PAT = re.compile(ur'(?i)\b((?:https?://|www\d{0,3}[.]|[a-z0-9.-]+[.][a-z]{2,4}/)(?:[^\s()<>]+|(([^\s()<>]+|(([^\s()<>]+)))))+(?:(([^\s()<>]+|(([^\s()<>]+))))|[^\s`!()\[\]{};:\'".,<>?\xab\xbb\u201c\u201d\u2018\u2019]))')
but it return some urls like :
https://t.co/h…
i need the correct answer please !
The fix provided by @arunchaganty missing escaping backslashes in the very last exclusion group. Code below adds them back.
GRUBER_URLINTEXT_PAT = re.compile(ur'(?i)\b((?:https?://|www\d{0,3}[.]|[a-z0-9.\-]+[.][a-z]{2,4}/)(?:[^\s()<>]|\(([^\s()<>]+|(\([^\s()<>]+\)))*\))+(?:\(([^\s()<>]+|(\([^\s()<>]+\)))*\)|[^\s`!()\[\]{};:\'".,<>?\xab\xbb\u201c\u201d\u2018\u2019]))')
This regex is awesome, I had to slightly modify it but I found a rare catastrophic backtracking bug with the string below (even without my modifications) :(
http://Download%20(Album%20of%20six%20wallpapers)
The problem is the %20(
Tested here: https://regex101.com/r/DAA8ww/1
Had to resort to using google's re2
(through pyre2 wrapper) instead of python's native re
in order to avoid the problem (had to remove the \u escaped unicode characters though).
The pattern can lead to a catastrophic backtracking because the 2nd group
(?:[^\s()<>]+|\(([^\s()<>]+|(\([^\s()<>]+\)))*\))+
is basically(x+|y)+
wherex = [^\s()<>]
.This caused the pattern to take an inordinate amount of time on the (real-life) input
New laws in 2015 to benefit undocumented immigrants https://t.co/EKICT9YCwu.................................
.A simple fix is to remove the
+
matching pattern for the inner[^\s()<>]
:Note: The earlier version of this comment did not remove the
+
and had a backtick that caused formatting errors. The one above should have fixed these errors!