⌘T | go to file |
⌘⌃P | go to project |
⌘R | go to methods |
⌃G | go to line |
⌘KB | toggle side bar |
⌘⇧P | command prompt |
NOTE I now use the conventions detailed in the SUIT framework
Used to provide structural templates.
Pattern
t-template-name
// http://paulirish.com/2011/requestanimationframe-for-smart-animating/ | |
// http://my.opera.com/emoller/blog/2011/12/20/requestanimationframe-for-smart-er-animating | |
// requestAnimationFrame polyfill by Erik Möller. fixes from Paul Irish and Tino Zijdel | |
// MIT license | |
(function() { | |
var lastTime = 0; | |
var vendors = ['ms', 'moz', 'webkit', 'o']; |
This is a post by Joel Spolsky. The original post is linked at the bottom.
This is such a common question here and elsewhere that I will attempt to write the world's most canonical answer to this question. Hopefully in the future when someone on answers.onstartups asks how to split up the ownership of their new company, you can simply point to this answer.
The most important principle: Fairness, and the perception of fairness, is much more valuable than owning a large stake. Almost everything that can go wrong in a startup will go wrong, and one of the biggest things that can go wrong is huge, angry, shouting matches between the founders as to who worked harder, who owns more, whose idea was it anyway, etc. That is why I would always rather split a new company 50-50 with a friend than insist on owning 60% because "it was my idea," or because "I was more experienced" or anything else. Why? Because if I split the company 60-40, the company is going to fail when we argue ourselves to death. And if you ju
When times get tough and people get nasty, you’ll need more than a killer smile. You’ll need a killer contract.
Used by 1000s of designers and developers Clarify what’s expected on both sides Helps build great relationships between you and your clients Plain and simple, no legal jargon Customisable to suit your business Used on countless web projects since 2008
…………………………
data:text/html, <style type="text/css">.e{position:absolute;top:0;right:0;bottom:0;left:0;}</style><div class="e" id="editor"></div><script src="http://d1n0x3qji82z53.cloudfront.net/src-min-noconflict/ace.js" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><script>var e=ace.edit("editor");e.setTheme("ace/theme/monokai");e.getSession().setMode("ace/mode/ruby");</script> | |
<!-- | |
For other language: Instead of `ace/mode/ruby`, Use | |
Markdown -> `ace/mode/markdown` | |
Python -> `ace/mode/python` | |
C/C++ -> `ace/mode/c_cpp` | |
Javscript -> `ace/mode/javascript` | |
Java -> `ace/mode/java` | |
Scala- -> `ace/mode/scala` |
This simple script will take a picture of a whiteboard and use parts of the ImageMagick library with sane defaults to clean it up tremendously.
The script is here:
#!/bin/bash
convert "$1" -morphology Convolve DoG:15,100,0 -negate -normalize -blur 0x1 -channel RBG -level 60%,91%,0.1 "$2"
(by @andrestaltz)
If you prefer to watch video tutorials with live-coding, then check out this series I recorded with the same contents as in this article: Egghead.io - Introduction to Reactive Programming.
All of the below properties or methods, when requested/called in JavaScript, will trigger the browser to synchronously calculate the style and layout*. This is also called reflow or layout thrashing, and is common performance bottleneck.
Generally, all APIs that synchronously provide layout metrics will trigger forced reflow / layout. Read on for additional cases and details.
elem.offsetLeft
,elem.offsetTop
,elem.offsetWidth
,elem.offsetHeight
,elem.offsetParent