- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/804115 (
rebasevsmerge). - https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/merging-vs-rebasing (
rebasevsmerge) - https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/undoing-changes/ (
resetvscheckoutvsrevert) - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2221658 (HEAD^ vs HEAD~) (See
git rev-parse) - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/292357 (
pullvsfetch) - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/39651 (
stashvsbranch) - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8358035 (
resetvscheckoutvsrevert)
All of the below properties or methods, when requested/called in JavaScript, will trigger the browser to synchronously calculate the style and layout*. This is also called reflow or layout thrashing, and is common performance bottleneck.
Generally, all APIs that synchronously provide layout metrics will trigger forced reflow / layout. Read on for additional cases and details.
elem.offsetLeft,elem.offsetTop,elem.offsetWidth,elem.offsetHeight,elem.offsetParent
I've been asked a few times over the last few months to put together a full write-up of the Git workflow we use at RichRelevance (and at Precog before), since I have referenced it in passing quite a few times in tweets and in person. The workflow is appreciably different from GitFlow and its derivatives, and thus it brings with it a different set of tradeoffs and optimizations. To that end, it would probably be helpful to go over exactly what workflow benefits I find to be beneficial or even necessary.
- Two developers working on independent features must never be blocked by each other
- No code freeze! Ever! For any reason!
- A developer must be able to base derivative work on another developer's work, without waiting for any third party
- Two developers working on inter-dependent features (or even the same feature) must be able to do so without interference from (or interfering with) any other parties
- Developers must be able to work on multiple features simultaneously, or at lea
Once upon a time…
I once took notes (almost sentence by sentence with not much editing) about the architectural design concepts - Command and Query Responsibility Segregation (CQRS) and Event Sourcing (ES) - from a presentation of Greg Young and published it as a gist (with the times when a given sentence was heard).
I then found other summaries of the talk and the gist has since been growing up. See the revisions to know the changes and where they came from (aka the sources).
It seems inevitable to throw Domain Driven Design (DDD) in to the mix.