(by @andrestaltz)
If you prefer to watch video tutorials with live-coding, then check out this series I recorded with the same contents as in this article: Egghead.io - Introduction to Reactive Programming.
(by @andrestaltz)
If you prefer to watch video tutorials with live-coding, then check out this series I recorded with the same contents as in this article: Egghead.io - Introduction to Reactive Programming.
Short (72 chars or less) summary
More detailed explanatory text. Wrap it to 72 characters. The blank
line separating the summary from the body is critical (unless you omit
the body entirely).
Write your commit message in the imperative: "Fix bug" and not "Fixed
bug" or "Fixes bug." This convention matches up with commit messages
# 0 is too far from ` ;) | |
set -g base-index 1 | |
# Automatically set window title | |
set-window-option -g automatic-rename on | |
set-option -g set-titles on | |
#set -g default-terminal screen-256color | |
set -g status-keys vi | |
set -g history-limit 10000 |
# to generate your dhparam.pem file, run in the terminal | |
openssl dhparam -out /etc/nginx/ssl/dhparam.pem 2048 |
1033edge.com | |
11mail.com | |
123.com | |
123box.net | |
123india.com | |
123mail.cl | |
123qwe.co.uk | |
126.com | |
150ml.com | |
15meg4free.com |
We should have at least three files: 'Widget.svelte', 'rollup.config.js' and 'package.json':
Widget.svelte
:<script>
export let name;
</script>
<h1>Hello {name}!</h1>
This document was originally written several years ago. At the time I was working as an execution core verification engineer at Arm. The following points are coloured heavily by working in and around the execution cores of various processors. Apply a pinch of salt; points contain varying degrees of opinion.
It is still my opinion that RISC-V could be much better designed; though I will also say that if I was building a 32 or 64-bit CPU today I'd likely implement the architecture to benefit from the existing tooling.
Mostly based upon the RISC-V ISA spec v2.0. Some updates have been made for v2.2
The RISC-V ISA has pursued minimalism to a fault. There is a large emphasis on minimizing instruction count, normalizing encoding, etc. This pursuit of minimalism has resulted in false orthogonalities (such as reusing the same instruction for branches, calls and returns) and a requirement for superfluous instructions which impacts code density both in terms of size and
This article has been given a more permanent home on my blog. Also, since it was first written, the development of the Promises/A+ specification has made the original emphasis on Promises/A seem somewhat outdated.
Promises are a software abstraction that makes working with asynchronous operations much more pleasant. In the most basic definition, your code will move from continuation-passing style:
getTweetsFor("domenic", function (err, results) {
// the rest of your code goes here.
Here's a comparison between how the same simple user definition would be defined using ArkType and Zod:
ArkType's definition syntax is more concise (definitions are about 50% shorter on average) as well as making it more visually obvious what the inferred TypeScript type will be. The ability to infer TypeScript definitions directly is the same, but ArkType's syntax is again more concise by allowing you to use typeof on a property of arkUser directly instead of using an extra "infer" helper.
In general, we also have taken significant steps to optimize and clarify our type hints when hovering over validators. For example, in the case above, this is what you see when you mouse over "zodUser":