przemoc

Keybase proof

I hereby claim:

• I am przemoc on github.
• I am przemoc (https://keybase.io/przemoc) on keybase.
• I have a public key ASAqkyJiZIDm1BPnP-S3TSYm4W206lESRnwkf1Yp1B8jwwo

To claim this, I am signing this object:

przemoc

Make pigz.c (2.3.3) compilable on MSYS2+MinGW-w64.

Based on AiZ's reverse patch posted on:
http://encode.ru/threads/1689-Google-Compress-Data-More-Densely-with-Zopfli?p=32684#post32684

--- pigz.c.bak	2016-02-03 23:33:58.896985400 +0100
+++ pigz.c	2016-02-04 00:21:44.597383100 +0100
@@ -331,6 +331,7 @@
 #include <sys/stat.h>   /* chmod(), stat(), fstat(), lstat(), struct stat, */
                         /* S_IFDIR, S_IFLNK, S_IFMT, S_IFREG */

przemoc

Package: *
Pin: release n=jessie-backports
Pin-Priority: 800

Package: *
Pin: release n=jessie-updates
Pin-Priority: 700

Package: *
Pin: release n=jessie

przemoc

### default values: sensitivity=128, speed=97
ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="input", ATTR{name}=="TPPS/2 IBM TrackPoint", ATTR{device/sensitivity}="196", ATTR{device/speed}="255"

przemoc

Android Application Downgrade

I'm using BakaReader EX (com.erakk.lnreader) as an example.

Instructions

1. Download desired version of your application, e.g.: https://github.com/calvinaquino/LNReader-Android/releases/download/1.1.34/BakaReader-EX-1.1.34.apk

przemoc

# [Arch] List provisions with packages providing them

# pacman-based solution
pacman -Si \
	| awk '/^$/{n=""}/^Name/{n=$3}/^Provides/{if($3!="None"){for(i=3;i<=NF;i++){if(t[$i]=="")t[$i]="";t[$i]=t[$i]" "n}}}END{for(p in t)printf("%44-s :%s\n",p,t[p])}' \
	| sort | less

# expac-based solution (better)
expac -S "%n %P" \
	| awk 'NF>1{for(i=2;i<=NF;i++){if(t[$i]=="")t[$i]="";t[$i]=t[$i]" "$1}}END{for(p in t)printf("%44-s :%s\n",p,t[p])}' \

przemoc

#!/bin/sh

# Simple script for downloading program stored on CNET:
# - AOMEI Partition Assistant Standard
# Tested on 2013-11-17.

set -e

get_page() { curl -LsS "$1"; }
get_href() { sed '/'"$1"'/!d;s,.*<a href=",,;s,".*,,;q'; }

przemoc

#!/bin/sh

_calcswsa()
{
	echo -n "$1"'258EAFA5-E914-47DA-95CA-C5AB0DC85B11' | sha1sum | awk '{print$1}' | xxd -r -p | base64
}

if [ -t 0 -a -z "$1" ]; then
	echo "usage: $0 [-] [SEC_WEBSOCKET_KEY]..."
	echo

przemoc

From 5d920ec604a896cfd8419f9360f3a81adedd19eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Przemyslaw Pawelczyk <przemoc@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:57:06 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] BadRAM for v2.6.32.x

Attempt to adapt BadRAM patches to recent kernel versions. Includes
improvements and fixes(?). Were previous versions working on x86_64?
I am kernel newbie so all my below thoughts might be severly wrong.

I am not sure about correctness of x86_32 path involving highmem. It is

przemoc

diff -ru memtest86+-4.00/error.c memtest86+-4.00x/error.c
--- memtest86+-4.00/error.c	2009-09-22 02:35:46.000000000 +0200
+++ memtest86+-4.00x/error.c	2010-01-30 16:15:11.000000000 +0100
@@ -256,8 +256,8 @@
 			clear_scroll();
 			v->erri.hdr_flag++;
 		}
-		/* Do not do badram patterns from test 0 or 5 */
-		if (v->test == 0 || v->test == 5) {
+		/* Do not do badram patterns from test 0 */