-
Create a new issue on GitHub.
-
Drag an image into the comment field.
-
Wait for the upload process to finish.
-
Copy the URL and use it in your Markdown files on GitHub.
-
-
Save vinkla/dca76249ba6b73c5dd66a4e986df4c8d to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Even more easily, without even creating an issue. You can just drop the image on this editor( Yes, the one on this page!), and not save the comment..
You can grab the nice url that was generated.
Thanks!
Thank you!
Thank you
Thanks man!
Thanks for showing how to do it!
Gracias
💓
Awesome! Thanks, dude!
Thanks a lot! 🤩
thanks bro ! 👍
Thank you. This is really helpful
Thank you.
Adding my thanks for a simple solution after several hours of frustration.
Superb... Thank you so much 👍
Wow, this saves me time... Thank you
Wow..Thank you so much!
holy 💩
How to remove?
Thanks!
Thank you vinkla!
Thanks!
nice trick... thanks
Gracias <3
thanks.
Thanks!
Awesome!
thanks
That's pitty it doesn't work directly in README.md editor.
NO NEED to save images... just drop a get the images address instantly!
NO NEED to save images... just drop a get the images address instantly!
this isn't working anymore for me
I've loved this feature, but it seems as of April 2023, Git changed things and now the images are wrapped so only members of that repository are allowed access. Something with assets
in the path.
eg: Now:
https://github.com/konacurrents/konacurrents/assets/5555/5b9fa87a-7d62-4c9d-9108-fde9abd433c9)
vs: what all described here shows:
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5555/long-uuid.JPEG
Anyone have more info on what seems a major change (but of course for security..)
Strange, when I do this in 2023 to my private repositories, there is no jpg link - but rather an indirect link that only lets those with permission to see the image. That changed this year as far as I can tell (and it's kinda unfortunate.) I guess I can make things public to get the link and private for the writeups.
![Segunda etapa](https://gist.gith
ub.com/assets/77646529/99c2c196-9d44-4821-a5ee-7d64fb7a0e52)
Probably not, but that doesn’t make it right.