React recently introduced an experimental profiler API. This page gives instructions on how to use this API in a production release of your app.
Table of Contents
React DOM automatically supports profiling in development mode for v16.5+, but since profiling adds some small additional overhead it is opt-in for production mode. This gist explains how to opt-in.
create different ssh key according the article Mac Set-Up Git
$ ssh-keygen -t rsa -C "your_email@youremail.com"
Note:
When this guide is more complete, the plan is to move it into Prepack documentation.
For now I put it out as a gist to gather initial feedback.
If you're building JavaScript apps, you might already be familiar with some tools that compile JavaScript code to equivalent JavaScript code:
- Babel lets you use newer JavaScript language features, and outputs equivalent code that targets older JavaScript engines.
Whether you're trying to give back to the open source community or collaborating on your own projects, knowing how to properly fork and generate pull requests is essential. Unfortunately, it's quite easy to make mistakes or not know what you should do when you're initially learning the process. I know that I certainly had considerable initial trouble with it, and I found a lot of the information on GitHub and around the internet to be rather piecemeal and incomplete - part of the process described here, another there, common hangups in a different place, and so on.
In an attempt to coallate this information for myself and others, this short tutorial is what I've found to be fairly standard procedure for creating a fork, doing your work, issuing a pull request, and merging that pull request back into the original project.
Just head over to the GitHub page and click the "Fork" button. It's just that simple. Once you've done that, you can use your favorite git client to clone your repo or j
let cache = new Map(); | |
let pending = new Map(); | |
function fetchTextSync(url) { | |
if (cache.has(url)) { | |
return cache.get(url); | |
} | |
if (pending.has(url)) { | |
throw pending.get(url); | |
} |
All of the below properties or methods, when requested/called in JavaScript, will trigger the browser to synchronously calculate the style and layout*. This is also called reflow or layout thrashing, and is common performance bottleneck.
Generally, all APIs that synchronously provide layout metrics will trigger forced reflow / layout. Read on for additional cases and details.
elem.offsetLeft
,elem.offsetTop
,elem.offsetWidth
,elem.offsetHeight
,elem.offsetParent
React recently introduced an experimental profiler API. After discussing this API with several teams at Facebook, one common piece of feedback was that the performance information would be more useful if it could be associated with the events that caused the application to render (e.g. button click, XHR response). Tracing these events (or "interactions") would enable more powerful tooling to be built around the timing information, capable of answering questions like "What caused this really slow commit?" or "How long does it typically take for this interaction to update the DOM?".
With version 16.4.3, React added experimental support for this tracing by way of a new NPM package, scheduler. However the public API for this package is not yet finalized and will likely change with upcoming minor releases, so it should be used with caution.
{url:'stun:stun01.sipphone.com'}, | |
{url:'stun:stun.ekiga.net'}, | |
{url:'stun:stun.fwdnet.net'}, | |
{url:'stun:stun.ideasip.com'}, | |
{url:'stun:stun.iptel.org'}, | |
{url:'stun:stun.rixtelecom.se'}, | |
{url:'stun:stun.schlund.de'}, | |
{url:'stun:stun.l.google.com:19302'}, | |
{url:'stun:stun1.l.google.com:19302'}, | |
{url:'stun:stun2.l.google.com:19302'}, |
9 March, 2019
We were discussing with @erusev what we can do with async operation when using useReducer()
in our application. Our app is simple and we don't want to use a state management library. All our requirements are satisfied with using one root useReducer()
. The problem we are facing and don't know how to solve is async operations.
In a discussion with Dan Abramov he recommends Solution 3 but points out that things are fresh with hooks and there could be better ways of handling the problem.